Yes, I have already noted to update this patch on the same lines as discussed in context of https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/99293622 On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:48 PM Wu, Hao A wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ranbir Singh > > Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 12:09 AM > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rsingh@ventanamicro.com > > Cc: Wu, Hao A ; Ni, Ray > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe: Fix > > SIGN_EXTENSION Coverity issue > > > > From: Ranbir Singh > > > > Line number 365 does contain a typecast with UINT32, but it is after > > all the operations (16-bit left shift followed by OR'ing) are over. > > To avoid any SIGN_EXTENSION, typecast the intermediate result after > > 16-bit left shift operation immediately with UINT32. > > > > Cc: Hao A Wu > > Cc: Ray Ni > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4209 > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh > > --- > > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe/AtaPassThruExecute.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe/AtaPassThruExecute.c > > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe/AtaPassThruExecute.c > > index a77852bae054..ccd4c5f05b59 100644 > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe/AtaPassThruExecute.c > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaBusDxe/AtaPassThruExecute.c > > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ IdentifyAtaDevice ( > > // Check logical block size > > > > // > > > > if ((PhyLogicSectorSupport & BIT12) != 0) { > > > > - BlockMedia->BlockSize = > (UINT32)(((IdentifyData->logic_sector_size_hi > > << 16) | IdentifyData->logic_sector_size_lo) * sizeof (UINT16)); > > > > + BlockMedia->BlockSize = > (((UINT32)(IdentifyData->logic_sector_size_hi > > << 16) | IdentifyData->logic_sector_size_lo) * sizeof (UINT16)); > > > > } > > > This patch seems to have the same issue with the concern raised in > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/99293622. > > Best Regards, > Hao Wu > > > > > > > > > > AtaDevice->BlockIo.Revision = EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL_REVISION2; > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >