From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f43.google.com (mail-ed1-f43.google.com [209.85.208.43]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.11797.1666367945011761811 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:59:05 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=BTXS1b7B; spf=pass (domain: google.com, ip: 209.85.208.43, mailfrom: dionnaglaze@google.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a13so7642007edj.0 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h6VVV6Nt7mRWA/zAl+V8ToCFgKaT3Wp6m6V8PE+W/ew=; b=BTXS1b7B9w+pVWm0IX9YfzYAvjzICaVqwbYM8eEMkDxc69VF+YTex9dS2IECrnehQR aN3+VeUynThkPmoV6nXySfBpsZjQ0uNmPqF3b/8BFpgwCEZE9JYTwHLuk/W3k6NMM16W hpMtucriLI0Edfd/QJIVR6/9Helx8lbiWp2SnnM1Tvv2EtowkX86icHGzyeD35FuOHH+ STedMJtW7SOs1gaj89KjCO6NbQ+3XEZ66UK2iH38aSvY6a7j8PHqql6lkXy3eKMsbQjA o2OO2vw4JR3nigpPtedP2gzrxlW8VY6K3/kLON4TNwkhKTgLRxkdDKKL++xJEJOL5+C0 ZyQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=h6VVV6Nt7mRWA/zAl+V8ToCFgKaT3Wp6m6V8PE+W/ew=; b=Bf3tlfg7foNSngHMeO7PzpJcM4blQfpcYLM0im1kuVnRmYPca16Df9ohK0Tis6qkh3 RwL3iThQ4BWAJl6ylvpuZOof1P1qGIbXyLfoDnOzl7SOwh9hyQnDgq1/YAv1G+YQngak 9bLoJFw1L9De28cgnSYDq8U29q90y9XY0TFAKhMkA7mMCM1BEM9HpjGl0RQFnDWDPK8L b60eDf87wv/kwhj8dzxa69p5wXgy9/T9Rr38MRFHC+jNvsi7//X2EZr/XNhj/n8Zqhue EWCNoExhCR3o7FivKJHRiKwv04bsO3pswEjdur8XT70mNveJmom0YWiRto3OcIRY6W31 lkhw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1mQWs0if4AKj0h+FhhXvZHaBGQKEdknoKh+DzJKrCAfEVfHz5l UYT+NUD03zp1+EAn3oPsJ3j5qYOZIfzb4AvkImzfkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7k1hj8zpx9IcS5k+ND93eskT51COiPjvBVQkD41ZYZZ8dWln4REY6C8n/XFvBUK/JXHunAAWUbIvtg6sPCPns= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:278d:b0:461:60d4:8ea4 with SMTP id b13-20020a056402278d00b0046160d48ea4mr1120394ede.419.1666367943368; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <01f901d8dc4f$e9beeac0$bd3cc040$@byosoft.com.cn> <011001d8e358$9f9aa910$decffb30$@byosoft.com.cn> In-Reply-To: From: "Dionna Glaze" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtlZGsyLWRldmVsXSDlm57lpI06IFtQQVRDSCBWNCAwMC8xMF0gSW50cm9kdWNlIExhenktYWNjZXB0IGZvciBUZHggZ3Vlc3Q=?= To: "Xu, Min M" Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "Gao, Liming" , "Gao, Zhichao" , "Ni, Ray" , "Aktas, Erdem" , Gerd Hoffmann , James Bottomley , "Yao, Jiewen" , Tom Lendacky , "Gao, Jiaqi" , "Wang, Jian J" , "Liu, Zhiguang" , "Kinney, Michael D" , Ard Biesheuvel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Min: > > I understand that they are for the different purpose and usage. But, their > > protocol name are very similar. > Yes. They do look very similar. > > > If there is no better protocol name, I will also be fine. > Dionna, what's your thought? > The accept_all_unaccepted_memory name came from Ard's suggestion on an earlier patch series where I was using a Pcd. We're talking about the name over on the spec bug https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3987#c26 I think that any name concerning unaccepted memory is going to look a little same-y to others, so it's going to be troublesome if we require that they all strongly differ in name. I'm not strongly attached to the name, I just want to be conservative about what the name implies about the expected overall behavior of the system when that has not actually been decided upon. -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)