From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com (mail-ej1-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.3720.1666305457542901434 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:37:37 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=H25ovBan; spf=pass (domain: google.com, ip: 209.85.218.45, mailfrom: dionnaglaze@google.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id bj12so2879316ejb.13 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2o/sl5dntJuhg2n3BnsAx5sXYH0NMLcwLjKIrsDgoeA=; b=H25ovBan+WGlIFgyltfvv7Xpa9WD2Si4CaO5e/Wrf0HrIym28Qk6bga3p3mLAJO7Dp j41SNYZPjyTKN7A49uOHilp5UMr91gY9wxQZid6Ybwgh9hCVR+wpwmXqlUZ9UdKu0J4l GOj7VCBO0LcOJdPi7/FJze20/Z3QnTaMX8acg5SkU3tmmUrWQXixS1I0sYkxZfVMvdtf CaU0iTEqeGtcoJS1402+8Zw/bqvxeAbJTeNinzaHmQMYU9pEAZVbvTs5404WOK+JJH1T vXgnFNSbhOrkbSneJW0cRfq1rMcDrLyzA9oHL445aAnycaV3Rcnr8Ht6po+tf3XI7zjO 6EnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=2o/sl5dntJuhg2n3BnsAx5sXYH0NMLcwLjKIrsDgoeA=; b=vJz1Cc1uGHc3lVSgw/fm323k/6rBSAhFwxuXzBdfwXnel4erML4h07KlSRv8slRIEs YjSep7CZtGlu/NIn9N6tBPZ3lefFJ6ef6wqaLAJXys6Fgw7jCISpttXF/bah7tXOTRzd M+COSN+mlRXEv5yhWPg86Sok7YSSSJjTSKrzRNfwSPVevPQaMHT9a4Ljls8FsaG4NIHf IhGPVE+rYCNxit6T1Ab+s2BahW9bu+KINuiQUNHJopbu/LTZPUuq84GaIfGtcAwt8oJf huncu9oEFAIgI6ED/3T7s4EjLr6We/HTW+pu0vhEOCQP8lyDGVcccr8tNt1k+ZaATUs0 ZJAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1tHFMSnMZL8FSNX66iUiE/QAmrwZfb6ms1GfJSQ29mIt6ooaSS JfDZ4BZDt6mRHpDotl5dDkzlDLi8wKge5CrRQrR6ng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6uoDNi/7ohkljCzk2nSa7CSBCwJzjn8KHCqYJdyf0trxKvrpLG3AFEs0l67O4/t+q6yxoySrvIKf56Jf0quNU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:97d4:b0:78e:1b8f:5767 with SMTP id js20-20020a17090797d400b0078e1b8f5767mr13045651ejc.473.1666305455872; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:37:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221005203329.469866-1-dionnaglaze@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Dionna Glaze" Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:37:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, "Ni, Ray" , "Xu, Min M" , Gerd Hoffmann , James Bottomley , Tom Lendacky , "Yao, Jiewen" , "Aktas, Erdem" , Andrew Fish , "Kinney, Michael D" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > That assumes the variable is non-volatile, but I suppose we could use > a volatile variable [other than OsIndications] as well. > I suppose that's true. Would you prefer volatile versions of OsIndications/OsIndicationsSupported added to the spec, or this proposed one-off toggle protocol? No specified global variables seem overloadable with this duty. -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)