From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.11378.1666366986055570956 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:43:06 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hM66vAyc; spf=pass (domain: google.com, ip: 209.85.208.54, mailfrom: dionnaglaze@google.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id z97so7349695ede.8 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZHzM/kwzf75Ft3WLZamlblWvs/bfX4mhdWev5L/b7BI=; b=hM66vAycNn6HbBqCNPOG21UdH9aGGuc1tM1vnBLgTgyWCEAxRezO9B1kkgp6IqdyBY o4L1/IcUj03oqFXXtSzWK3ekOL0h0s+IaCICD58uSznDhTYjsYEzvP3iDvBcxOc0BewJ b6swM7SRdiHlay7JD+SdmpAhKDepN1FWROcsplTpexdF95/iIEuDxHTaAsT2H5hsIqKU MIudDy9o2/GRezwQTjFt2Wg7LMmLQbaD1xQVqxwZDh1pgi7BYGRPGWmL5x1kwZICCLXe CDgoUjcd4oM6HFn1o2EL8GkpR/ZOs+tFfUbH5gXOdlWp/GcUYtO5oLNnFyDRQfY3pzcO 0ccA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZHzM/kwzf75Ft3WLZamlblWvs/bfX4mhdWev5L/b7BI=; b=hxnn332H/PF7L7o/W8LWhVspD3bIeXpzyNOEZbHqrgSPMHlUGbkRfR9tP9UFOk7X1v lfOvAyYoaMKouJOUjNu7DOvfDQVf64amOuGSJnQpDwdDW/kL3gkp7jvP8BfheaXz1G44 Lr8nU3Jjl/usGidfmregtE07Q99UIRKoGSQcka6z5Kw8qlf4ybRq2dJgkxYdOik4UNSd 50+6wcLC+kmRV5j7XuOcOMPVg7yYLok6c/aiQWrFa8YisNmZom5z9dpK2V8HDpePEXgs VVxTK6wYT77IpPoyDOqlsV7/UjJIoWuJOR68lbp4hWBePA9MEMSQvmfle2B160vi6su4 1P1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2TnA4ub6+xmsFc920oGWUqNGvS4ngFq485vmCDwK9PqU6MzYwA 5lAgCzn1gtqm99CuMj6lIBqyIAbF2g41k3fp+7iyJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6a46A5rRdIFiIbxYw4DOYMC67JrK1KZaN6L16mERBTHab+/rFZpwCtNeG/FYoUVfs8ptHMxgGJQjv7bvvjTDI= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cad5:0:b0:454:88dc:2c22 with SMTP id l21-20020aa7cad5000000b0045488dc2c22mr18026664edt.352.1666366983518; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221005203329.469866-1-dionnaglaze@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Dionna Glaze" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:42:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, "Ni, Ray" , "Xu, Min M" , Gerd Hoffmann , James Bottomley , Tom Lendacky , "Yao, Jiewen" , "Aktas, Erdem" , Andrew Fish , "Kinney, Michael D" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > I suppose that's true. Would you prefer volatile versions of > > OsIndications/OsIndicationsSupported added to the spec, or this > > proposed one-off toggle protocol? No specified global variables seem > > overloadable with this duty. > > > > No it would have to be a completely separate variable, I don't think > we can use OsIndications for this. Certainly, I meant new variables that are volatile and also play a similar role as OsIndications[Supported]. -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)