Okay. So I am fine with that stepped approach- let us please make a list of
such items that we are deciding on doing in the next version so that we can
track them?

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 6:35 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:12:58AM -0800, dhaval@rivosinc.com wrote:
> > What I see in the current implementation is:
> >
> > * UEFICpuPkg implements gEfiCpuIo2ProtocolGuid which does not seem to be
> generic.
> > * ARMPkg implements it which seems similar to what RV needs.
> >
> Yes, this is exact copy of the ArmPkg version. I guess Loongarch also will
> need the same.
>
> > Do we really expect this to be platform specific implementation and
> hence it should be in respective platform folders? Neither x86/ARM seem to
> follow this model?
>
> Correct. Both real and virtual platforms would need it. But adding
> inside UefiCpuPkg/CpuI02Dxe looked bit messy which needs bit more
> discussion and not sure whether it is a good idea to create parallel to
> CpuIo2Dxe. So, I thought it is better to add it in RiscVVirt for now
> instead of delaying the virt support even further. Let us take that as a
> separate activity after this series with inputs from different CPU
> architectures.
>
> Thanks
> Sunil
>
>
>

-- 
Thanks!
=D