public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Rosario <bcr@google.com>
To: Ken_Taylor@phoenix.com
Cc: Alain Gefflaut <alaingef@google.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: Hardcoded IDE Controller B/D/F (0/1/1) in BdsPlatform.c?
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:28:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAz1XLKAxGT_b48-g91eRgwO_iffoYbVAfw0P+xa1oq1BGUw2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8147e54ded6e405abdafbed45bd52199@SCL-EXCHMB-13.phoenix.com>

Hi Ken,

That's what I had guessed -- thanks for confirming that it's platform
specific.

In my use case, I actually want the code to work on multiple hardware
configurations, so I can't just replace the hardcoded B/D/F with the one
used by a particular platform. Does the change to SataController.c that I
mentioned in the original email make sense? I've tested it and confirmed
that it works on my platform, but I want to get a sanity check that that is
an appropriate place to put this code.

Thanks,
Bryan

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:48 PM Ken Taylor <Ken_Taylor@phoenix.com> wrote:

> Hi Bryan,
>
> That appears to be silicon or platform specific code.  It's intended for
> one specific hardware configuration.  Unless you have an identical hardware
> configuration, those particular register writes are actually nonsensical.
>
> I think what you need to do is consult the silicon specific documentation
> for your particular hardware configuration, and determine what silicon
> specific registers need to be configured to what specific values to support
> your specific hardware design.
>
> Regards,
> -Ken.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Bryan Rosario via edk2-devel
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 4:07 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Alain Gefflaut
> Subject: [edk2] Hardcoded IDE Controller B/D/F (0/1/1) in BdsPlatform.c?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that there is apparently a hardcoded B/D/F for an IDE Controller
> in BdsPlatform.c, when setting bit 15 of a particular register:
>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/14923c1a6bf9940b48feeaf47cb5d6c662b6528c/OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/BdsPlatform.c#L1612-L1617
> .
>
> Why is this hardcoded? Is it just old code that has hung around? I noticed
> that this code is from this commit, and the surrounding code at the time
> had lots of hardcoded B/D/Fs:
>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/40f2c454343be84ab3bacf9955cc8d7842c70b5c
> .
>
> The context of this question is that I'm trying to make this work in a
> configuration with an IDE Controller located at a different B/D/F, and so
> the hardcoded value of 0/1/1 doesn't work for me.
>
> If I want to change this so that it's not hardcoded, what is a good
> approach? I've added some code locally to the IdeInitSetTiming function in
> SataController.c to set the bit using the PciIo structure which is opened
> specifically on the controller in question -- does that sound like the
> right approach?
> Link to the function I'm referring to:
>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/f6b0258d25a63ae3d3bc6430abe30fb625abc52a/OvmfPkg/SataControllerDxe/SataController.c#L1091-L1099
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-22  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-22  0:06 Hardcoded IDE Controller B/D/F (0/1/1) in BdsPlatform.c? Bryan Rosario
     [not found] ` <8147e54ded6e405abdafbed45bd52199@SCL-EXCHMB-13.phoenix.com>
2018-11-22  1:28   ` Bryan Rosario [this message]
2018-11-22  2:06     ` Ken Taylor
2018-11-22  3:05       ` Bryan Rosario
2018-11-22 16:40 ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAz1XLKAxGT_b48-g91eRgwO_iffoYbVAfw0P+xa1oq1BGUw2w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox