From: "Marcello Sylvester Bauer" <marcello.bauer@9elements.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Guo Dong <guo.dong@intel.com>,
"Ma, Maurice" <maurice.ma@intel.com>,
"Desimone, Nathaniel L" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] UefipayloadPkg: Protect coreboot tables
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB1kMnfbijekZVxt=Y_-W1cazhxW7nT_AN2-BRuAtyiZ7a4h_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65d39699-fc22-8362-ddb3-8c04e7129f5a@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7107 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:24 PM Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/20 19:32, Guo Dong wrote:
> >
> > OK. Let me merge this patch firstly. /Guo
>
> The PR at <https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/924> failed 17 days
> ago and there have been no updates since, as far as I can tell. I've
> closed the PR for now.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
"Mergify / Rule: Automatically merge a PR when all required checks pass and
'push' label is present (merge)" is
the only that failed, because mergify thinks it has no rights to update the
base branch (tianocore/master).
I don't understand why. What should I do?
Thanks
Marcello
> >
> > From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer@9elements.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 2:00 AM
> > To: Dong, Guo <guo.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com>; Desimone,
> Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <
> star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] UefipayloadPkg: Protect
> coreboot tables
> >
> > Hi Guo,
> >
> > Sounds like a good proposal, but it would be great to merge this change
> temporarily.
> > In some cases of the current implementation edk2 does override the
> memory area, where the coreboot table pointer is located.
> > Therefore the kernel and cbmem tool is not able to locate the tables
> anymore.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marcello
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:40 PM Dong, Guo <guo.dong@intel.com<mailto:
> guo.dong@intel.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marcello,
> >
> > In the UEFI payload, we should not hardcoded any memory usage. It means
> UEFI payload should use the memory map whatever reported from the
> bootloader. I plan to remove this hardcoded memory usage soon.
> > Before that, it is OK for me to merge this change if you want.
> > BTW, did you see any issue with current implement?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guo
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> <
> devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> On Behalf Of Marcello
> >> Sylvester Bauer
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 5:01 AM
> >> To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>
> >> Cc: Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma@intel.com<mailto:maurice.ma@intel.com>>;
> Desimone, Nathaniel L
> >> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com<mailto:nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>>;
> Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>>
> >> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] UefipayloadPkg: Protect coreboot
> tables
> >>
> >> From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com<mailto:
> patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com<mailto:
> patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer@9elements.com
> <mailto:marcello.bauer@9elements.com>>
> >> Cc: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com<mailto:maurice.ma@intel.com>>
> >> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com<mailto:
> nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>>
> >> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com<mailto:star.zeng@intel.com>>
> >> ---
> >> UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c
> >> b/UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c
> >> index 22972453117a..b3ff065a537e 100644
> >> --- a/UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c
> >> +++ b/UefiPayloadPkg/BlSupportPei/BlSupportPei.c
> >> @@ -390,24 +390,36 @@ BlPeiEntryPoint (
> >> EFI_PEI_GRAPHICS_DEVICE_INFO_HOB GfxDeviceInfo;
> >>
> >> EFI_PEI_GRAPHICS_DEVICE_INFO_HOB *NewGfxDeviceInfo;
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >>
> >> - //
> >>
> >> - // Report lower 640KB of RAM. Attribute EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_TESTED
> >>
> >> - // is intentionally omitted to prevent erasing of the coreboot header
> >>
> >> - // record before it is processed by ParseMemoryInfo.
> >>
> >> + // Report lower 640KB of RAM.
> >>
> >> + // Mark memory as reserved to keep coreboot header in place.
> >>
> >> //
> >>
> >> BuildResourceDescriptorHob (
> >>
> >> - EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_RESERVED,
> >>
> >> (
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_PRESENT |
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_INITIALIZED |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_TESTED |
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_UNCACHEABLE |
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_COMBINEABLE |
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_THROUGH_CACHEABLE |
> >>
> >> EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK_CACHEABLE
> >>
> >> ),
> >>
> >> (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(0),
> >>
> >> - (UINT64)(0xA0000)
> >>
> >> + (UINT64)(0x1000)
> >>
> >> + );
> >>
> >> +
> >>
> >> + BuildResourceDescriptorHob (
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> >>
> >> + (
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_PRESENT |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_INITIALIZED |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_UNCACHEABLE |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_COMBINEABLE |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_THROUGH_CACHEABLE |
> >>
> >> + EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK_CACHEABLE
> >>
> >> + ),
> >>
> >> + (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(0x1000),
> >>
> >> + (UINT64)(0x9F000)
> >>
> >> );
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> BuildResourceDescriptorHob (
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
> >>
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> >> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >>
> >> View/Reply Online (#62229):
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/62229
> >> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/75374752/1781375
> >> Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io<mailto:
> devel%2Bowner@edk2.groups.io>
> >> Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [guo.dong@intel.com
> <mailto:guo.dong@intel.com>]
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> >
> >
> > --
> > [Marcello Sylvester Bauer]
> >
> > [http://static.9elements.com/logo-signature.png]
> > 9elements Agency GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
> > Email: [DEINE EMAIL ADDRESSE]<
> https://static.9elements.com/email_signatur.html>
> > Phone: +49 234 68 94 188<tel:+492346894188>
> > Mobile: +49 1722847618<tel:+491722847618>
> >
> > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
> > Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
> > Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar
> >
> > Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO<https://9elements.com/privacy>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
*[Marcello Sylvester Bauer]*
9elements Agency GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
Email: [DEINE EMAIL ADDRESSE]
<https://static.9elements.com/email_signatur.html>
Phone: *+49 234 68 94 188 <+492346894188>*
Mobile: *+49 1722847618 <+491722847618>*
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar
Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO <https://9elements.com/privacy>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14081 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-08 12:01 [PATCH v1 0/1] Protect coreboot tables Marcello Sylvester Bauer
2020-07-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] UefipayloadPkg: " Marcello Sylvester Bauer
2020-09-08 21:40 ` [edk2-devel] " Guo Dong
2020-09-14 8:59 ` Marcello Sylvester Bauer
2020-09-14 17:32 ` Guo Dong
2020-10-01 10:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-05 15:34 ` Marcello Sylvester Bauer [this message]
2020-10-06 8:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB1kMnfbijekZVxt=Y_-W1cazhxW7nT_AN2-BRuAtyiZ7a4h_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox