public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Fix stack overflow issue due to nested interrupts
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:09:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABgObfa5aQmPGweFGFiFn7XwuHkJ6X5KD-35JQ2iZU9JmB6ESg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0102018df9b5541d-c855d474-9fcf-47af-bd0f-8ea913c984e3-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1885 bytes --]

Il ven 1 mar 2024, 12:10 Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org> ha scritto:

> It feels as though this should be able to be cleanly modelled with a
> single global state array
>
>    BOOLEAN mSavedInterruptState[TPL_HIGH_LEVEL]
>

Pretty much, yes. But you only have to write it when the interrupts are
already disabled, so the bitmask works and makes it easier to clear "all
values at NewTpl and above" with just an AND.

>
> (or possibly a bitmask, though using the array avoids having to disable
> interrupts just to write a value).
>
> I still need to think through the subtleties, to make sure it could cope
> with pathological edge cases such as
>
>    OldTpl = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
>
>    ...
>
>    gBS->RestoreTPL (OldTpl);
>    gBS->RestoreTPL (OldTpl);
>
> or
>
>    OldTpl = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL - 1);
>    gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
>
>    ..
>
>    gBS->RestoreTPL (OldTpl);
>
> I think that at least one of the above pathological usage patterns would
> break the existing mInterruptedTplMask patches, since they currently
> clear state in RestoreTPL() and so will not correctly handle a duplicate
> call to RestoreTPL().
>

I think my patch works (modulo the 1 vs. 1U issue) for the second.
Declaring the first to be invalid is a good idea IMO. Also it would only
break in interrupt handlers and would revert to just causing a stack
overflow in the interrupt storm scenario, so it wouldn't be too bad...

Paolo


> I'll try to get a patch put together over the weekend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#116238): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116238
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104642317/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 13:02 [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix stack overflow issue due to nested interrupts Ni, Ray
2024-02-29 13:02 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Return correct interrupt state Ni, Ray
2024-02-29 13:02 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Fix stack overflow issue due to nested interrupts Ni, Ray
2024-02-29 13:23   ` Michael Brown
2024-02-29 16:43     ` Michael D Kinney
2024-02-29 17:39       ` Michael Brown
2024-02-29 19:09         ` Michael D Kinney
2024-02-29 19:41           ` Michael Brown
2024-02-29 17:39       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-29 19:09         ` Michael D Kinney
2024-02-29 19:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-29 19:16     ` Michael D Kinney
2024-02-29 20:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-29 19:22     ` Michael Brown
2024-02-29 19:26       ` Michael D Kinney
2024-02-29 19:44         ` Michael Brown
2024-02-29 20:11       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-01  0:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-01  3:07     ` Ni, Ray
2024-03-01  8:37       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-01  9:27         ` Michael Brown
2024-03-01  9:33           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-01 11:10             ` Michael Brown
2024-03-01 12:09               ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-03-05  4:19               ` Ni, Ray
     [not found]               ` <17B9C3692B44139F.30946@groups.io>
2024-06-18  5:54                 ` Ni, Ray
2024-03-01  8:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-01  9:20     ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABgObfa5aQmPGweFGFiFn7XwuHkJ6X5KD-35JQ2iZU9JmB6ESg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox