public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@gmail.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Alcantara, Paulo" <paulo.alc.cavalcanti@hp.com>,
	 "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86)
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 21:14:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACgnt7-w7GwWZhi3Z2BKE4jLxk57Ez_h6DKjDnWj33ZA6sqf5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b36a9d7f-8f35-0931-0125-ccbc4d2caa9b@redhat.com>

Thanks a lot guys.

Now things make sense.

Em qui, 5 de jan de 2017 às 11:18, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
escreveu:

> On 01/05/17 13:16, Alcantara, Paulo wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Rafael Machado
> >> Sent: quinta-feira, 5 de janeiro de 2017 10:00
> >> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >> Subject: [edk2] Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86)
> >>
> >> Hi everyone
> >>
> >> I was taking a look at how the OS boots after the firmware and
> bootloader
> >> are done.
> >>
> >> To understand this I started to take a look at the linux source code,
> and the
> >> strange is that I saw some bios legacy interrupts being called.
> >>
> >> The flow I checked is this:
> >>
> >> void main(void)  -->  linux/arch/x86/boot/main.c
> >>      int detect_memory(void) -->  linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
> >>            static int detect_memory_e820(void) -->
> >> linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
> >>                    intcall(0x15, &ireg, &oreg) -->
> linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
> >>
> >>
> >> At the last call the value of ireg is this one:
> >>
> >> ireg.ax  = 0xe820;
> >> ireg.cx  = sizeof buf;
> >> ireg.edx = SMAP;
> >> ireg.di  = (size_t)&buf;
> >>
> >>
> >> As we can see this is done so the OS knows the memory map, so the OS can
> >> do all its magic.
> >>
> >> Finally, my question is:
> >>
> >> How could linux, or any other OS, boot on a system with UEFI firmware
> that
> >> does not have CSM (compatibility support module) ?
> >
> > The code you pasted above seems to be executed when booting Linux on
> > PC BIOS firmware. See below.
> >
> >> I consider that some parts of the hypothetical OS need to be written to
> call
> >> some UEFI protocols. Am I right ?
> >
> > As far as I know, there are currently two ways of booting Linux on
> > UEFI firmware:
> >
> > 1) The OS loader (bootloader as a PE/COFF image) uses the EFI handover
> > protocol to boot the Linux kernel image. What the loader does is
> > basically to find the entry point offset (handover_offset) in that
> > image and jump to it. The entry point conforms to ABI defined in UEFI
> > spec.
> >
> > 2) The kernel may be built as PE/COFF binary (UEFI image) so the
> firmware can
> > directly boot it at BDS without any external OS loader.
> >
> > You might want to look at how OVMF boots up Linux through QEMU's
> command-line parameter "-kernel" by using EFI handover protocol.
>
> See also:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/632528/
>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-07 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-05 11:16 Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86) Rafael Machado
2017-01-05 11:59 ` Rafael Machado
2017-01-05 12:16   ` Alcantara, Paulo
2017-01-05 13:18     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-01-07 21:14       ` Rafael Machado [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACgnt7-w7GwWZhi3Z2BKE4jLxk57Ez_h6DKjDnWj33ZA6sqf5w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox