From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail05.groups.io (mail05.groups.io [45.79.224.7]) by spool.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4166D81194 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:02:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=MCfE9NO7hSyqgw/b7UHnxZGfhmNK3s+T9sH6+36hDsc=; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Precedence:List-Subscribe:List-Help:Sender:List-Id:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Reply-To:List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type; s=20240830; t=1736352127; v=1; x=1736611326; b=G/zbhBMDakTv5bJwY3eFbLMb8KM8utMYzFFlZ2nfX5Ht0Caq9yiftrC3pPNjHfyXkPvHFpV9 +7H3SiWRFP9I+qhhuNdDYJMArGzNmj6hGanNnaLZI+GACTFBAbBJ+Cip12gDZPYVpbLyrN2J/ba lpLYQc0mPFhLNoe8Gt2xBi8YKcuAWN+TJbJhKL0XKBpRDGw9a/UeG6P6VuJ8TURe/o47mFR19rU TeGga/gt3yCMv53tX/EfTwusKgjsiEfRQ5FWl4Qk9fTXVSZ2E3HLYLVoHkMolxBGzoameeLVXzZ Jvevm++4cSyqHI2MSYcsOwUJmmAwIZm8wc40vps03Cp+g== X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id AqkrYY7687511xGqSAJsGVeo; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:06 -0800 X-Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.22896.1736352125582403857 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:05 -0800 X-Received: from pps.filterd (m0279863.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 508BkjHZ007682 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:02:05 GMT X-Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com (mail-yb1-f199.google.com [209.85.219.199]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 441phg8yyb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:02:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e399d4ef55cso36998251276.2 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:05 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: WTYYKrXh1x1Jbehk6ndvcNptx7686176AA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuUqflbdSvMxlQWuRbnH5qY4o3ISyNKR3cn2FcX0knpAN0bLXEoKHIDSYA0qWB gc1aESNplLwQJipW0vdGkt0Rji7IPbUFsn5Yy1pzF8Izy3DOPlDizuPaNqFxrBXdfvr6ZRak= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:998c:b0:6f4:6ad9:b1a with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6f531304814mr26124577b3.36.1736352123873; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFpbHhF6mtlataR+7qDq2lzYcwlxNxIntcCmOodliFphxqMkk9o1uVebHNtvz/n/Ddc7dvupPy0p+WwSMYqrr8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:998c:b0:6f4:6ad9:b1a with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6f531304814mr26124077b3.36.1736352123558; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2nvp477n4ah4o4tlbw5h3a5tsrrzfbzfmdoeqw2cpmygxzsnhl@3swp7whktlfu> In-Reply-To: <2nvp477n4ah4o4tlbw5h3a5tsrrzfbzfmdoeqw2cpmygxzsnhl@3swp7whktlfu> From: "Leif Lindholm via groups.io" Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:01:52 +0000 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvagQW2X0i5hSAbCE3AS_r0ruFa2XlwlkL1cKGrHfKtYCrSvypErJLfJyGQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Expansion of ARCH in .dsc files To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Ajan Zhong , Ard Biesheuvel , "Kinney, Michael D" , Michael Kubacki X-Proofpoint-GUID: e_PPu-rSYmvtxFTyTr50Ur1jqhIg0F00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: e_PPu-rSYmvtxFTyTr50Ur1jqhIg0F00 Precedence: Bulk List-Subscribe: List-Help: Sender: devel@edk2.groups.io List-Id: Mailing-List: list devel@edk2.groups.io; contact devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:02:05 -0800 Resent-From: leif.lindholm@oss.qualcomm.com Reply-To: devel@edk2.groups.io,leif.lindholm@oss.qualcomm.com List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-GND-Status: LEGIT Authentication-Results: spool.mail.gandi.net; dkim=pass header.d=groups.io header.s=20240830 header.b="G/zbhBMD"; spf=pass (spool.mail.gandi.net: domain of bounce@groups.io designates 45.79.224.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce@groups.io; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=groups.io On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 15:01, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Because "the list of all architectures being built simultaneously" > > simply isn't very useful information build-time. > > I think this is not intended for building all archs in simultaneously > (even though that often works too), but for firmware images using code > from multiple architectures. That is (or used to be?) common in the x86 > world, where firmware can run the PEI phase in 32-bit mode (aka IA32) > and the DXE phase in 64-bit mode (aka X64). > > See OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc Yes, indeed. It feels like a bit of a hack introduced specifically for that specific case (but not documented as such). So, Ajan - I guess that means arguably the CI job should be reworked to call the different arch builds independently. Then the problem would go away even without the Defines.$ARCH change. / Leif -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#120973): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/120973 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110483263/7686176 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-