From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a; helo=mail-oi0-x22a.google.com; envelope-from=moheban79@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F3622283512 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c12so10415234oic.7 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SqXpiLHxCafd+zIA7onKLym/MppWrrT9hfKaoETlWGc=; b=brEuUOMGzfiTzAtafFSc/zXtlS9qe//yCfnPtKH9tg+RsCaqQJ+t7G41JhFO5ib81q 4SsVeKmmi4KKm3QkNOlC+d5O77U8PqFM0Ov7T4QfM3vz2a8JxaOcNu7hxh/Qy0lLRjx2 YEY6dOtbyoYzV4nfC5iecQmPYO2sr2mOJKprqrAUnpsjIZ9h77kLyu/h89YqB5bGt3xl sw0KnwvwqnfPgQsG5rhlv1qDkiWJiwDnmnKKHncdnDW+KkqU4shPBpcqb+RJvebNQSfn BwcCc/RnVRXwfBHoeOk7aOzd/87XdlarkqPhsi9P8m/lOPtNeHx+Ltctud0287/v/C+M GYLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SqXpiLHxCafd+zIA7onKLym/MppWrrT9hfKaoETlWGc=; b=MdjtzJg2vA/G2yknHXDMhRe0PkVA21J7JYX9+cXbK/+EUo71H9+QmePLfWtKhYDgg0 qW0XHVecqgS7MNcttQoUJLbCzzbHrZx6yyp/uLHY31YiEimTeA3lRqt0OyH/An3wwjms uPkqyKRVOKfrThmigrxL8x3lI1fmS0mceLSaFr+/10U733lz96rx16OtGAxg1Iac/pJ9 t/RS1Pe+7yFQJ8BEZTCsykCNkYVa1b5vRfUl0Qu1Ws+v5Wwb7D2whuZUs2jL37FrfuPt z1cPf4U81ohibdccb346PPx4HN2jZhrIjDAz+Su/W0oEZ+cHRtNYQOchO28dalfWO0H/ bnxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Hh7AspgRc7TyqREU3W3YaAPwiPltju6zNdIvA+6k/V0ZvLiJOd Icv1N6Q2trePyfqzGHLIe74dNf7edNosYZs1MOY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtSIwf8NA8r57sC6T2RB/Q1VPxGtnl4aVG+vPg6nZbW/BMDjK2/GvqBzGXQ23azvqFhhRyD6Goo2lv5FNiu6DE= X-Received: by 10.202.80.73 with SMTP id e70mr2850004oib.280.1520781706778; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.211.143 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) From: david moheban Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 Subject: HELP: Qemu not able to load Duet image X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 15:15:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Just wanted to followup on my experimentation with Qemu and EDK2's DuetPkg. So far I have successfully been able to load the Duet image in Qemu after refining my image making skills. Though having an issue with UDK2010 NOT being able to load the 'Bootx64' or 'BootIa32' efi boot loader. I also compiled 2010-SR1 and this problem is not present and works with 2010-SR1. Using DDK3790 and VS2010 to compile both packages in DEBUG mode. Should also mention was able to load the EDK-2010 standard Duet Image inside Virtualbox as well HOWEVER need to turn on 'EFI' mode inside Virtualbox settings for the bootx64 or bootia32 efi loader to load! You might ask why using such an old version of EDK? Well I have noticed that UDK-2010 compiles with the smallest file size and I am planing to insert the final image into my firmware with limited space so every KB counts! So if anyone can offer some advice I would very much appreciate it.. Thank you. David.