public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13@gmail.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Linton" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	devel@edk2.groups.io, "Pete Batard" <pete@akeo.ie>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud" <samer.el-haj-mahmoud@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: Signal ReadyToBoot on platform recovery
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 18:36:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEg-Je9uzzew+NMJtwtMvbgNdkwz9CVmVjXqOmohhBhHf_UCsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a81cdc03-3d1e-9096-5c1a-11d54c6c58c3@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:35 AM Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/31/23 23:27, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> > On 10/31/23 12:37, Neal Gompa via groups.io wrote:
> >> From: Neal Gompa <ngompa@fedoraproject.org>
> >>
> >> Currently, the ReadyToBoot event is only signaled when a formal Boot
> >> Manager option is executed (in BmBoot.c -> EfiBootManagerBoot ()).
> >>
> >> However, the introduction of Platform Recovery in UEFI 2.5 makes it
> >> necessary to signal ReadyToBoot when a Platform Recovery boot loader
> >> runs because otherwise it may lead to the execution of a boot loader
> >> that has similar requirements to a regular one that is not launched
> >> as a Boot Manager option.
> >>
> >> This is especially critical to ensuring that the graphical console
> >> is actually usable during platform recovery, as some platforms do
> >> rely on the ConsolePrefDxe driver, which only performs console
> >> initialization after ReadyToBoot is triggered.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes that behavior by calling EfiSignalEventReadyToBoot ()
> >> in EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption () when invoking platform recovery,
> >> which is the function that sets up the platform recovery boot process.
> >>
> >> The expected behavior has been clarified in the UEFI 2.10 specification
> >> to explicitly indicate this behavior is required for correct operation.
> >>
> >> This is a rebased version of the patch originally written by Pete Batard.
> >
> > Took me a bit to swap in that whole conversation again, and recheck the
> > spec's and code paths, but this all looks fine to me and should allow
> > the PFTF build to drop the similar patch from Pete that has been carried
> > downstream for the past couple years.
> >
> > As for testing the previous patch has been in the field for a couple
> > years now and i'm not aware of it causing any issues. The additional
> > restriction of limiting it to platform recovery logically makes sense,
> > and as far as I can see shouldn't cause any problems.
> >
> > So,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> >
> >
> > As a PS: I also went to check the ready to boot behavior for OsRecovery
> > and realized that apparently none of that support was ever merged?
>
> What else is there, outside of this patch, in need of upstreaming?
>
> > That seems a bit of an oversight since its been in the spec for a few years now.
>
> "ready-to-boot for OsRecovery" is new in UEFI 2.10 (according to the
> commit message), which is quite recent ("Aug 29, 2022").
>
> I couldn't find the Mantis ticket in the Revision History (for 2.10) though.
>

Is there anything else holding up committing this patch? Jeremy and
you reviewed it earlier in the month...



--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#111703): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/111703
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102302654/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31 17:37 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: Signal ReadyToBoot on platform recovery Neal Gompa
2023-10-31 22:27 ` Jeremy Linton
2023-11-02 10:35   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-24 23:36     ` Neal Gompa [this message]
2023-12-07  4:47       ` Neal Gompa
2023-12-07  7:40         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-12  8:11           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-18 21:55             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-19 11:50               ` Leif Lindholm
2023-12-19 12:59                 ` 回复: " gaoliming via groups.io
2023-12-19 13:59                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-19 14:11                     ` Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
2023-12-22  3:03                       ` Neal Gompa
2023-11-02 10:20 ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEg-Je9uzzew+NMJtwtMvbgNdkwz9CVmVjXqOmohhBhHf_UCsw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox