From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44; helo=mail-vs1-xe44.google.com; envelope-from=sumit.garg@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-vs1-xe44.google.com (mail-vs1-xe44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02ED208D6141 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe44.google.com with SMTP id e16so5810609vsq.6 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:19:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JVCOJuxBT4Q72Sjch7l5uZTBYXqMqvHKHhHFXVtOQJg=; b=DR6ujrymLmQbgAVvdpIwBSHI66YA9B9l1OsKiQgmB4Wk5PVPgtvNa+2Ww3/P3FrE3t Dr/AM14reZBpRPxxRK0iK1Y/lsGpGZTZPxnQoLY2SIwpRIoz2M5O71IysW6llo5eW9/P IYsP6ZzNtMYtNN608nMEr3x94JiaK6GVb6FxCEwS6+hleRojK3cKYCRKSoUVU+jV9bHt SFCdnmHHYW33XCHBNKEz5HxEyM0zDB8spN91QaZAlsaVC2fbOUPj5WwENSro5vUmOMIj +r7Z0bx+aciYztCTDayLjrUcawZlgMrBgXep+xK/7DOoabE3mkVuDLdl5gIKAG7MFYpz jwOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JVCOJuxBT4Q72Sjch7l5uZTBYXqMqvHKHhHFXVtOQJg=; b=PkAT6SgclCIGzl6gEjmuyIBCi2+sGjEkZ5jnKnb2YOOuy9xRxUH1khDDAzRq4BT5xJ GqD2ZcNj9dkTfHIy4gT0QVYrgku3jywjDSdxrVrGhlKSZ9E1EGSNTYH2fyR5aS7Bjyph pHOxWA8TceKQ5mZuu5M+1gc0NAUq/lIauZngVTgicGCO1WUqTrOTDFttafQX7DZK9i6m 08G6JahTBItWrmlrjnKLzVDGqG/XzPc2DUyBA7mjLnT5trjziV5L9Or+g3EsWusoQwSs ADmDONdJMHrx6lk0FNddcmIkbkuIF7g1K0P+KQxhb1CqABYeQFpmapZbMBYsJKcFvs1p sMDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZyJXpvwfBwKMhBbR/jFRf3mpzeYPX+jqaygGvKxeX8fphqwzmR L0OMpPwv20pxxwk2jpXmPg5m/ITKIecwX8qixMSrZ1nu37XDag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbRqRW9pfi/K8R3voUCjTzMRJtP7lDC4VoNNC8E8v+k3tSYGdbb1/3/k1gazny2TL9wOlgMqFW8qrGfyn0Ab8E= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2045:: with SMTP id g66mr13786246vsg.180.1549876776233; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:19:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1549353684-13748-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Sumit Garg Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:49:25 +0530 Message-ID: To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Leif Lindholm Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-non-osi 1/1] Platform/Socionext: update TF-A binary to upstream release X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:19:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 14:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 05:55, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 17:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 09:01, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > > > > > > Update TF-A to upstream v2.0 release (Commit: dbc8d9496ead). Also update > > > > OP-TEE to upstream v3.4.0 release (Commit: 406c609bbf08). > > > > > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 > > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Following is reference repo to pull this patch: > > > > ssh://git@git.linaro.org/people/sumit.garg/edk2-non-osi.git > > > > > > > > Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox/fip_all_arm_tf.bin | Bin 415251 -> 402963 bytes > > > > 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox/fip_all_arm_tf.bin b/Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox/fip_all_arm_tf.bin > > > > index bc6f4563a5d6..e6ce62a2a20b 100644 > > > > Binary files a/Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox/fip_all_arm_tf.bin and b/Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox/fip_all_arm_tf.bin differ > > > > -- > > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Sumit > > > > > > I created a firmware build with this change, could you please double check it? > > > > > > > Thanks Ard for incorporating this updated TF-A image. And yes this > > updated firmware capsule could work pretty well for me. > > > > Thanks Sumit. > > I take it you used fwupdate to install it? Which version did you use? Yes I used fwupdate to install DeveloperBox.Cap. Following is version info: Distro version: Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch) Release: 9.5 Codename: stretch fwupdate version: fwupdate/stretch-backports,now 10-3~bpo9+1 arm64 [installed] > (We are seeing segfaults with fwupdate 12 on debian unstable) Is it specific to any particular capsule update (like this one) or in general when trying to run fwupdate? -Sumit