Hi,

May I suggest you just port the bare rust language (no crates, no std) to
EDK2? It seems far more plausible to expect people to use a cut down
version with some bindings to the rest of the project instead of hoping
people just use the whole of rust, a lot of which isnt proven (or even used
AFAIK) in bare metal projects. Porting just the bare minimum is way more
realistic in my opinion.

Thanks,
Pedro

On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, 18:02 Ayush Singh, <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone. In the previous email thread [1], I discussed the
> proposal to move Rust std work to edk2-staging and mentioned its
> potential problems. After some discussion with mentors, we arrived at
> the conclusion to have a rustlang [2] fork under the Tianocore
> organization, and move all the std related work there. We can then open
> a PR upstream from there, while allowing PRs in this repository. This
> should help provide an easier and streamlined way for people to
> experiment and work on this project while it is in the process of being
> merged upstream.
>
>
> For a status update about tests:
>
> - passed: 12797
>
> - failed: 40
>
> - ignored: 375
>
>
> Yours Sincerely,
>
> Ayush Singh
>
>
> [1]: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91989
>
> [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>