public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pedro Falcato" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: kraxel@redhat.com, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC/RFT PATCH] OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe: don't rely on TPLs for re-entrancy
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKbZUD2cKwjks-otT6AqgBTxm106TQiXt_EHPzzOeQSNuSyYWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFc1zEbQ8rjQXG-CKd=zHvM6zxrb0qTQLDoxZVGHXasFQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:12 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 13:08, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 08:25, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > What is the status?  Merged?  Or waiting for testing still?  If so I can
> > > > create a test build with the patch and ask our QE department to check
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Still waiting for testing, so yes, please test.
> >
> > Hmm, QE reports back it slows down the boot alot.  No boot hangs yet
> > with 12 test runs so far, which isn't that much for a reproduce rate
> > below 20% ...
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=2211060#c28
> >
> > So I guess we go with the TPL version for the coming stable tag and
> > leave any improvements for later ...
> >
>
> Yeah, this was not going to make the stable tag in any case.
>
> The boot speed regression seems odd, though - this is effectively UP
> code so there shouldn't be any contention, the only thing this patch
> does is ensure that the critical section is restarted if it was
> interrupted

FWIW: Given completely correct logic, straightforward logic, a lock
cmpxchg is much slower(3-4x) than an a non-lock cmpxchg, which itself
is around 2x as slow as a regular relaxed load + store.
See https://gist.github.com/heatd/49c9be23ccb1f4ad8dfeac231da2647a for
a nice fun test benchmark.

HOWEVER, given this is likely in IO paths, I would *really* not expect
this to make a difference, right? Even virtio drivers will themselves
trap with a VMEXIT whenever you touch a hardware register...

Gerd, could you folks get a perf kvm (perf-kvm(1)) recording out of
that OVMF build? Assuming you can get that thing to work, that is,
personally it mysteriously stopped working 6 years ago for me :)

-- 
Pedro


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#107988): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/107988
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/100256049/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-23 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-20 13:45 [edk2-devel] [RFC/RFT PATCH] OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe: don't rely on TPLs for re-entrancy Ard Biesheuvel
2023-07-21 22:55 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-07-24 14:21   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-07-24 17:08     ` Pedro Falcato
2023-08-22  6:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-08-22  7:57   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-23 11:07     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-08-23 15:11       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-23 17:18         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-08-23 18:10         ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2023-08-24  8:06           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-08-24 10:31             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-28  9:16               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-08-28 11:13                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-31 16:01                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-09-04 11:45                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-09-04 12:06                       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKbZUD2cKwjks-otT6AqgBTxm106TQiXt_EHPzzOeQSNuSyYWQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox