public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pedro Falcato" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com
Cc: Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>,
	 Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>,
	 Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>,
	 "Leif Lindholm (Quic)" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] edk2 uncrustify update (73.0.8)?
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 19:07:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKbZUD2z=Ct=Hf0Ju7ZQ1im8Ls_kDPC-r+LerKaKfvQTwQWkFQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0107c96b-849a-db48-194b-1a4c1f3b0c78@redhat.com>

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:58 AM Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> recently I encountered an uncrustify failure on github.
>
> The reason was that my local uncrustify was *more recent* (73.0.8) than
> the one we use in edk2 CI (which is 73.0.3, per the edk2 file
> ".pytool/Plugin/UncrustifyCheck/uncrustify_ext_dep.yaml").

Wait, you can use upstream uncrustify? I'm just using whatever
uncrustify version I took from the project-mu fork...

>
> Updating the version number in the YAML file (i.e., advancing edk2 to
> version 73.0.8) seems easy enough, but:
>
> - Do you think 73.0.8 is mature enough for adoption in edk2?
>
>   This upstream uncrustify release was tagged in April (and I can't see
>   any more recent commits), so I assume it should be stable.
>
> - Would the version update require a whole-tree re-uncrustification?

Please, no. I didn't mind doing an initial reformatting at first, but
doing this continuously is both 1) problem-prone 2) just amazing
amounts of churn.
Let's say I have version N, you have version N+1 - we may never get
any final, formatted output as your version formats it differently
from mine.

I don't know how the CI is doing its thing atm (I haven't merged
anything myself to edk2), but the uncrustify check should be relaxed
to just a warning. There's nothing wrong with what my uncrustify
version is formatting to, there's nothing wrong with yours either, and
CI isn't necessarily wrong either.

And, to be fair, I already find uncrustify a large pain in the butt to
use (requiring a custom fork really does not help), but I find the
benefits worth it *locally*, as my coding style is also quite
different from the NT-esque style.

-- 
Pedro


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#111174): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/111174
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102559740/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-13 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-13 11:58 [edk2-devel] edk2 uncrustify update (73.0.8)? Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-13 12:29 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-11-13 19:14   ` Rebecca Cran via groups.io
2023-11-13 20:37     ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-13 19:07 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2023-11-13 20:21   ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-13 21:05     ` Michael D Kinney
2023-11-14 14:51   ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-14 15:12     ` Rebecca Cran via groups.io
2023-11-15  8:52       ` Laszlo Ersek
     [not found] ` <17974449E158DE38.1153@groups.io>
2023-11-13 19:10   ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-13 20:08 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-13 20:37   ` Rebecca Cran
2023-11-13 21:33     ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-14 15:01       ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-16  8:29         ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-16 17:36           ` Michael Kubacki
2023-11-23  2:07             ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-17  9:08           ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-23  1:44             ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-14  1:46     ` Michael Kubacki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKbZUD2z=Ct=Hf0Ju7ZQ1im8Ls_kDPC-r+LerKaKfvQTwQWkFQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox