From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f; helo=mail-io0-x22f.google.com; envelope-from=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31ACB22135D4A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d21so3462800ioc.5 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:38:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/6toQVVg+BFkpVvuw0fh2INi5AvscPuFtfE67u/K1WY=; b=XEwg7ain/wF6MGobxqHA4JwIvP43IED7VoC6XtgeoiWxtKVD3LNpH5Ds8xixvrbJgb oM8UUmUF4GobfwwiNg21jBe/rsOro8u7H235pNqUDbY7x8DSuzLmh6qIjFVQW1Ye7pJH ULJPKq2hlJILvqDh23cwkgDo4hDMpeIcOPGQA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/6toQVVg+BFkpVvuw0fh2INi5AvscPuFtfE67u/K1WY=; b=rth5LFNfvm84iGUcmEWeqLoeQ/Sg4Py8ipnYw9Pnro4IB//5DJ731lnnFV0l/R6aD2 nROXKjQz2mexYbw7TMO0UwM0R8fFDzFZBmNE1CwCDBZEKY2MOdS9GP5xQ78iACPmQlT+ P99xQPsJKi8jtvgXy853MlErKrsXed6RiuSCTanKCaKPI67FgDK/72jzmMJd4IrGseFM p52RPD9THIH9ZLcj1a/GKXDz7MUrpLx7xIYK9Od5e/wuHoSBKBBx7EzJTeQMKtoB92ZR rItui0zoIzuct4ExrdSrPN6jRgIRVPgnK8sZ215jQjuNCIVMXmZCCS0NV65+OnF/RBzY Xrjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EZn4yEYtW3nMw7LziQ8lrMXgZciJpNAdNSlBjhT/ue2o1Fpwhs OAAmdptW5vqMDRIZo5cgwQ6+HW53e3EJKuYPLAIPreb6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu3lEtxm6GHhFdmY/EvvFq1kLe3DQKceW0VHRdIjL42JSzJSjFZMkMF9zlC5GIk1jMhHl+QjwofIOqyQDoX4dY= X-Received: by 10.107.5.199 with SMTP id 190mr8540331iof.107.1520851130165; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:38:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.138.209 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:38:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180312103808.GD60232@SZX1000114654> References: <1520837611-94728-1-git-send-email-heyi.guo@linaro.org> <1520837611-94728-2-git-send-email-heyi.guo@linaro.org> <54c4aab8-cc61-b4cc-6ab0-325dd42cca35@arm.com> <20180312102643.GC60232@SZX1000114654> <20180312103808.GD60232@SZX1000114654> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:38:49 +0000 Message-ID: To: Guo Heyi Cc: Marc Zyngier , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Yi Li , Leif Lindholm Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ArmPkg/TimerDxe: Add DSB for timer compare value reload X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:32:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 12 March 2018 at 10:38, Guo Heyi wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I just tested with an ISB and it also worked for our platform. > > So is it acceptable to add an ISB after reloading timer compare value? > I am fine with that if Marc is. -- Ard.