From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/1] Platforms/RPi3: Restructure platform in preparation for Pi 4
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-AuyCv4z6+UvnumCjpYuRoqwZKUy2hQ76=H+ny7HowUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0468063-071e-92d5-1f58-6b45cd8b60e3@redhat.com>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 15:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/21/19 2:52 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > On 2019.10.21 13:28, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Pete,
> >>
> >> On 10/21/19 1:25 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>> In preparation for adding Raspberry Pi 4 support, the Pi 3 platform
> >>> is restructured by factorizing all the drivers and libraries that are
> >>> going to be commonly used by the two platforms.
> >>>
> >>> Because much of the Pi 4 SoC is an extension of the Pi 3 one this
> >>> means that almost everything, except the ACPI tables, is moved up
> >>> into a new common RaspberryPi/ subdirectory that will serve both
> >>> platforms. The .dec is also moved to this directory, under a new
> >>> RaspberryPi.dec name, and existing references to it are updated.
> >>>
...
> >>
> >> This change seems not related to the rest of your refactor.
> >
> > It is. See https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/49288
> >
> > The problem is we have no choice but to break the patch in two sections,
> > one that applies to edk2-platforms and the other to edk2-non-osi, since
> > these are separate repos, and the LogoDxe changes belong to non-osi.
> >
> > We need to have part of the non-osi patch that is applied to
> > edk2-platforms, and it would make little sense to break it down into the
> > non-osi related and platforms related, since it still relies on the
> > non-osi changes having been applied.
>
> I see.
>
> >
> > If anything, I guess we could consider that the non-osi patch should
> > come first. Still, whatever we do here, as long as only one of non-osi
> > and platform is applied, builds are going to be broken, and there is no
> > way to fix that unless you do consider the set of platforms + non-osi as
> > a single patch.
>
> Agreed, this is a egg/chicken problem.
>
I dealt with this in the past by just making sure the non-osi and
platform changes are applied at the same time. So it is good to make
note of this in the cover letter, but other than that, there is no way
we can apply interdependent changes to two separate repositories at
the same time without either breaking bisect for one of them, or
making a huge effort to add temporary code, defines etc that will be
removed again right after the changes have landed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 11:25 [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/1] Platforms/RPi3: Restructure platform in preparation for Pi 4 Pete Batard
2019-10-21 12:28 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-21 12:52 ` Pete Batard
2019-10-21 13:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-21 13:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-10-21 13:37 ` Pete Batard
2019-10-21 13:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-10-21 14:28 ` Pete Batard
2019-10-21 14:39 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-10-21 16:59 ` Pete Batard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu-AuyCv4z6+UvnumCjpYuRoqwZKUy2hQ76=H+ny7HowUA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox