From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Shi, Steven" <steven.shi@intel.com>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] BaseTools-GenFw:Add new x86_64 Elf relocation types for PIC/PIE code
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:00:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-MxNWQNnUdPrOEPWR+CqTjyYySs=tbq7BYRiqhEVRXFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B31033824FA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 1 August 2016 at 09:54, Shi, Steven <steven.shi@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 1 August 2016 at 09:19, Shi, Steven <steven.shi@intel.com<mailto:steven.shi@intel.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The fact that it works does not make it safe. Having multiple fixups
>> >> >> for the same symbol in the .reloc section is a problem, and so is
>> >> >> reapplying GOTPCRELX to places where the original instruction has
>> been
>> >> >> replaced by the linker.
>> >> >>
>> >> > [Steven]: I still don't understand why there will be multiple fixups for the
>> >> same symbol in the .reloc section?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Remember this example
>> >>
>> >> >> > int n;
>> >> >> > int f () { return n; }
>> >> >> > int g () { return n; }
>> >> >> > int h () { return n; }
>> >>
>> >> If every 'return n' results in a GOTPCREL relocation, how are you
>> >> going to make sure that the GOT entry for 'n' is only fixed up a
>> >> single time?
>> >
>> > [Steven]: the 'return n' will not result in relocation, but the 'int n' will result
>> in the relocation in GOT. The three 'return n' will point to the same 'int n'
>> relocation item. So, we need only fixup 'int n' once, all three 'return n' will
>> use the correct global 'n' value.
>>
>> Every 'return n' will result in a GOTPCREL relocation against n. And
>> your code emits a relocation for the GOT entry every time.
>>
> [Steven]: I don't think so. please give a real case and offer its source code to prove " Every 'return n' will result in a GOTPCREL relocation against n ".
>
Compiling the code above using
gcc -c -O -fpic /tmp/pie.c -o pie.o
and dumping it using
readelf -r pie.o
gives me
Relocation section '.rela.text' at offset 0x250 contains 3 entries:
Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend
000000000003 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n - 4
00000000000d 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n - 4
000000000017 000a0000002a R_X86_64_REX_GOTP 0000000000000004 n - 4
...
--
Ard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-01 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1467967364-11556-1-git-send-email-steven.shi@intel.com>
[not found] ` <1467967364-11556-3-git-send-email-steven.shi@intel.com>
2016-07-30 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] BaseTools-GenFw:Add new x86_64 Elf relocation types for PIC/PIE code Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-30 14:09 ` Shi, Steven
2016-07-30 14:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-31 3:08 ` Shi, Steven
2016-07-31 5:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-31 19:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 4:39 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 5:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 6:13 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 6:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 7:19 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 7:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-01 7:54 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-01 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-08-01 8:28 ` Shi, Steven
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B31033825EE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu80u+CJLVtD5tTo5RrJb7LH0Qfnbj=7b7NUqrbf2aOPrA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B31033826FE@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu9MSisR1T_jr=DNyCs24We5=2vUgQZJ9t_rZmCYC8qvHg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B310338275F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-08-01 10:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-02 11:40 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-02 12:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 20:13 ` Jordan Justen
2016-08-03 20:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 20:53 ` Jordan Justen
2016-08-03 20:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-03 23:26 ` Shi, Steven
2016-08-03 20:55 ` Nicolas Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu-MxNWQNnUdPrOEPWR+CqTjyYySs=tbq7BYRiqhEVRXFg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox