From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: alloc blobs from 64-bit space unless restricted
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:05:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-PCLuHVXV=Z0Nat=RU3HEXWT0K-PBQz9SevM94aG=B-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29ef9616-4b75-5b37-f154-97585267c23b@redhat.com>
On 8 June 2017 at 18:40, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/08/17 12:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 7 June 2017 at 23:10, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/06/17 20:16, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/17 19:47, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-06-03 08:42:03, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>>>> ... by narrower than 8-byte ADD_POINTER references.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Introduce the CollectRestrictedAllocations() function, which iterates over
>>>>>
>>>>> How about Collect32BitRestrictedAllocations and similar treatment for
>>>>> other names that just say 'restricted'?
>>>>
>>>> Something like this crossed my mind, but I didn't know how to prefix the
>>>> simple variable / parameter names "RestrictedAllocations" with "32Bit",
>>>> as the identifiers cannot start with a digit.
>>>>
>>>> I even thought of spelling it out, as in
>>>> "ThirtyTwoBitRestrictedAllocations", but that seemed ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>> Prefixing "32Bit" with an underscore, _32Bit, looks ugly, plus the C
>>>> standard actually reserves it:
>>>>
>>>> All identifiers that begin with an underscore are always reserved
>>>> for use as identifiers with file scope in both the ordinary and tag
>>>> name spaces.
>>>>
>>>> While I'd only use this variable name as function parameter / local
>>>> variable, and thereby I'd shadow any such impl. defined global variable
>>>> ("identifiers with file scope"), the shadowing would trigger a compiler
>>>> warning for sure, and break the build.
>>>>
>>>> What do you suggest?
>>>
>>> Ultimately I went with
>>>
>>> s/RestrictedAllocations/AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit/
>>>
>>> in the patch body and in the commit message too. Cleaned up the line
>>> lengths and such as well, plus retested the patch.
>>>
>>> Commit 4275f38507a4.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Laszlo,
>>
>> Thanks again for the effort. Sadly, though, this patch is breaking my CI build:
>>
>> OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c: In function 'InstallQemuFwCfgTables':
>> OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c:357:29: error:
>> 'AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit' may be used uninitialized in this
>> function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> if (OrderedCollectionFind (
>> ^
>> OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe/QemuFwCfgAcpi.c:975:23: note:
>> 'AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit' was declared here
>> ORDERED_COLLECTION *AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit;
>> ^
>>
>
> Indeed, Gerd's Jenkins CI (using GCC49) reported the same (non-)issue.
>
> It is a compiler bug. The compiler reports that the ProcessCmdAllocate()
> function may be called with "AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit"
> uninitialized. That's not the case; this function call is only reached
> if CollectAllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit() returns EFI_SUCCESS --
> otherwise we jump to the "FreeLoader" label, way past the
> ProcessCmdAllocate() call --, and when
> CollectAllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit() succeeds, it will have
> "AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit" assigned.
>
> In order to expedite things, could you please help me by submitting a
> one-liner patch? Namely, please set "AllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit" to
> NULL right before the CollectAllocationsRestrictedTo32Bit() function call.
>
Done
Thanks,
Ard.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-08 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-03 15:42 [PATCH 0/1] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: alloc blobs from 64-bit space unless restricted Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-03 18:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-05 17:47 ` Jordan Justen
2017-06-06 18:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-07 23:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-08 10:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 18:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-08 19:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu-PCLuHVXV=Z0Nat=RU3HEXWT0K-PBQz9SevM94aG=B-w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox