From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c; helo=mail-it0-x22c.google.com; envelope-from=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-it0-x22c.google.com (mail-it0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348D021B02839 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:14:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t1so13902582ite.5 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 03:19:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OzszMeHr0KPHnhlq0eHU5vd88RhuMXKN2/m7CdTcKLw=; b=hQGnrRiBKzoMbiDxGOvpZErgBAKNMpIYp7u2uZ5DVb/91Pz8H+Hj+BHbXcsnFAnfjd v12buxzOluAQhlWse+ptcq94BdDL1RIFoponKF6dw1ZIk5ttX7A79qwkfCNgnB0Bl1kj MJiyA9qzWViBR+3LRGaWr5TiDSoNMbjiUpDdk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OzszMeHr0KPHnhlq0eHU5vd88RhuMXKN2/m7CdTcKLw=; b=lsdqcxIa3T2i8tq88sauxz2gHHwYNcBrgK2rJaHgmD6ETxo3suiD79RJB/RFy44jLF H8pqyE5zubC+L1IW38nKihYkpcinRWqm9iSnJc96RLqifYPNvUQysyJHfxvZLeVDIXbg an60XxgRxK7U9os/Is0qE/o4xegOKm1CkBBfPavgSAB2EQ5/46yHfhixyrTCC6SoCbcv 8xaJreVxO0FM7yFi5TKxbM4b/D7BCdNLClPHM/pLdtX8wuanysw/HKr4qB/bOvus8fgt Qf8mKkFYWbH4nTajQxjUNSXU8YDVNUlE9f7NoVnMJM0MKduzCcj3o0zvi2AYRAuRVIEm YBxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7ORYQK5q+a2oSbRYp0dfGYBH+sRulDs0mRi/6gCaKfVzdLJuwI s0JbzQP6AIwLxhuGaSWGl+D3pN0flOIqgoBaXguxyg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbLlRqeMM2jP1JAfCfCBPDtXGTdDWd+EGAINtC9rSef78B9WxwNLU6FZa0Ya3dtedmoetiqub4OXFPO0LvXmpo= X-Received: by 10.107.2.137 with SMTP id 131mr39124747ioc.186.1512645541154; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 03:19:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.104.16 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:19:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <515cbe9a-fa89-6bc7-2909-6ccb295ec68b@redhat.com> References: <20171206113917.6166-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <06C8AB66E78EE34A949939824ABE2B313B5E441A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <515cbe9a-fa89-6bc7-2909-6ccb295ec68b@redhat.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:19:00 +0000 Message-ID: To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: "Shi, Steven" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "leif.lindholm@linaro.org" , "Gao, Liming" , "Zhu, Yonghong" , "evan.lloyd@arm.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] BaseTools/tools_def: add CLANG38 LTO versions for AARCH64 and ARM X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:14:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 7 December 2017 at 11:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 12/07/17 03:05, Shi, Steven wrote: >> Hi Ard, >> I'm OK for the patch. >> BTW, would you mind to help add the "-Wno-unused-const-variable" in the CLANG38_WARNING_OVERRIDES? I happen to need add it in CLANG38 (https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790) and I see it seems a shared flag for ARM/AARCH64 as well. > > I suggest we handle that flag / BZ separately from this patch. (If Ard > feels very generous, he could append a separate patch to this series, > for adding the flag, but I don't think we can *ask* for that. It's a > totally separate topic.) > Yes, it is. But guess what, I was feeling very generous, so I did exactly that. (I am guessing Steven is very busy, so I don't mind doing his work :-)) -- Ard.