From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniil Egranov <daniil.egranov@arm.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA Map/Umap bounce buffer
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 13:23:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-irny9sz6J-FmrSE_UKzL9jKX9CdVnM=csw_V3LpqTxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9g7sDqVE7ARgZd6pLyNgB1EJZNs_QJS2r9r4=QP7yyCw@mail.gmail.com>
On 9 October 2017 at 11:40, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 9 October 2017 at 08:42, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> wrote:
>> The "read"/"write" is from the Bus Master's point of view.
>>
>>
>> Thanks/Ray
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Daniil
>>> Egranov
>>> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:16 AM
>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
>>> ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
>>> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA
>>> Map/Umap bounce buffer
>>>
>>> The patch corrects the logic of transferring data between a bounce buffer and a
>>> real buffer above 4GB:
>>> 1. In the case of mapping a bounce buffer for the write operation, data from a
>>> real buffer should be copied into a bounce buffer.
>>> 2.In the case of unmapping a bounce buffer for the read operation, data should
>>> be copied from a bounce buffer into a real buffer.
>>>
>>> The patch resolves a Juno board issue with the the grub and SATA drives.
>>>
>
> I am intrigued by this.
>
> So as I suggested, this has to do with 64-bit DMA, but not in the way
> I suspected. UEFI itself never hits this code path, because it runs
> entirely < 32 GB, but as soon as GRUB starts allocating loader data
> and use it for DMA, the bounce buffering kicks in because apparently,
> the SATA controller is not 64-bit DMA capable.
>
> Are you using the SataSiI3132Dxe driver on Juno? Does this help at all?
>
> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
> b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
> index 2fb5fd68db01..a938563ebdd6 100644
> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/SataSiI3132Dxe/SiI3132AtaPassThru.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ SiI3132AtaPassThruCommand (
> }
>
> Status = PciIo->Map (
> - PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterRead,
> + PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite,
> Packet->InDataBuffer, &InDataBufferLength,
> &PhysInDataBuffer, &PciAllocMapping
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ SiI3132AtaPassThruCommand (
> OutDataBufferLength = Packet->OutTransferLength * SataDevice->BlockSize;
>
> Status = PciIo->Map (
> - PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterWrite,
> + PciIo, EfiPciIoOperationBusMasterRead,
> Packet->OutDataBuffer, &OutDataBufferLength,
> &PhysOutDataBuffer, &PciAllocMapping
> );
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
Also, it might make sense to find out if the hardware is really not
64-bit DMA capable, or whether the driver simply fails to set the
EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE attribute.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 1:15 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Fixed PCI DMA Map/Umap bounce buffer Daniil Egranov
2017-10-09 7:42 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-10-09 10:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-09 12:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-10-10 3:41 ` Daniil Egranov
2017-10-10 8:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-27 5:58 ` Daniil Egranov
2017-10-27 7:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu-irny9sz6J-FmrSE_UKzL9jKX9CdVnM=csw_V3LpqTxw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox