From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] MdeModulePkg: introduce EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:41:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-vM_FdTUqcGzBU9sBoe9-VYh14FFAj5uqSMGuK34OY_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170324223819.11377-5-lersek@redhat.com>
On 24 March 2017 at 22:38, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> The presence of this GUID in the PPI database, and/or in the DXE protocol
> database (as dictated by the platform's needs in these firmware phases)
> implies that the platform provides the operating system with an ACPI-based
> hardware description. This is not necessarily exclusive with other types
> of hardware description (for example, a Device Tree-based one).
>
> A platform PEIM and/or DXE driver is supposed to produce a single instance
> of the PPI and/or protocol (with NULL contents), if appropriate. The
> decision to produce the PPI and/or protocol is platform specific; for
> example, in the DXE phase, it could depend on an HII checkbox / underlying
> non-volatile UEFI variable.
>
> In the DXE phase, the protocol is meant to be depended-upon by
> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe", indirectly:
>
> * In the long term, interested platforms will establish this dependency by
> hooking an (upcoming) NULL-class DepexLib instance into AcpiTableDxe in
> their DSC files, pointing DepexLib's DEPEX through a FixedAtBuild PCD to
> the GUID introduced here. (For the prerequisite BaseTools feature, refer
> to <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444>).
>
> * In the short term, an interested platform may hook a private NULL-class
> library instance (called e.g. "PlatformHasAcpiLib") into AcpiTableDxe.
> Such a library instance would be a specialization of the above described
> generic DepexLib, with the DEPEX open-coded on the GUID introduced here.
>
> Either way, the platform makes EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL and (if enabled)
> EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL dependent on the platform's dynamic decision to
> produce or not to produce a NULL protocol instance with this GUID.
>
> In turn, other (platform and universal) DXE drivers that produce ACPI
> tables will wait for EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL / EFI_ACPI_SDT_PROTOCOL, via
> DEPEX, protocol notify, or a simple gBS->LocateProtocol() in a "late
> enough" callback (such as Ready To Boot).
>
> Because this GUID is not standard, it is prefixed with EDKII / Edkii, as
> seen elsewhere in MdeModulePkg and SecurityPkg. In addition, an effort is
> made to avoid the phrase "AcpiPlatform", as that belongs to drivers /
> libraries that produce platform specific ACPI content (as opposed to
> deciding whether the entire firmware will have access to
> EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL, or any similar facilities in the PEI phase).
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v3:
> - rename gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiProtocolGuid to gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid
> [Star]
> - update commit message and code comments to reflect possible use as a
> PPI as well [Star]
> - move GUID from ArmPkg to MdeModulePkg [Leif, Ard]
> - split PlatformHasAcpiLib to a separate patch [Star]
>
> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 ++
> MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> index 626e479f5e45..2d94881206d3 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> @@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ [Guids]
> gEdkiiNonDiscoverableUhciDeviceGuid = { 0xA8CDA0A2, 0x4F37, 0x4A1B, {0x8E, 0x10, 0x8E, 0xF3, 0xCC, 0x3B, 0xF3, 0xA8 } }
> gEdkiiNonDiscoverableXhciDeviceGuid = { 0xB1BE0BC5, 0x6C28, 0x442D, {0xAA, 0x37, 0x15, 0x1B, 0x42, 0x57, 0xBD, 0x78 } }
>
> + ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
> + gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } }
> +
> [Ppis]
> ## Include/Ppi/AtaController.h
> gPeiAtaControllerPpiGuid = { 0xa45e60d1, 0xc719, 0x44aa, { 0xb0, 0x7a, 0xaa, 0x77, 0x7f, 0x85, 0x90, 0x6d }}
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ad517821375d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +/** @file
> + EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID
> +
> + A NULL protocol instance with this GUID in the DXE protocol database, and/or
> + a NULL PPI with this GUID in the PPI database, implies that the platform
> + provides the operating system with an ACPI-based hardware description. Note
> + that this is not necessarily exclusive with different kinds of hardware
> + description (for example, a Device Tree-based one). A platform driver and/or
> + PEIM is supposed to produce a single instance of the protocol and/or PPI
> + (with NULL contents), if appropriate.
> +
> + Copyright (C) 2017, Red Hat, Inc.
> +
> + This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available
> + under the terms and conditions of the BSD License that accompanies this
> + distribution. The full text of the license may be found at
> + http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php.
> +
> + THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
> + WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
> +**/
> +
> +
> +#ifndef __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__
> +#define __EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_H__
> +
> +#define EDKII_PLATFORM_HAS_ACPI_GUID \
> + { \
> + 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, \
> + { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } \
> + }
> +
> +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid;
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.9.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-24 22:38 [PATCH v3 00/12] ArmVirtPkg: don't forward the DT to the OS if QEMU provides ACPI Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] Revert "ArmVirtPkg/FdtClientDxe: make DT table installation !ACPI dependent" Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] Revert "ArmVirtPkg/FdtClientDxe: install DT configuration table at ReadyToBoot" Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ArmVirtPkg/XenAcpiPlatformDxe: don't cast UINT64 to pointer directly Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] MdeModulePkg: introduce EDKII Platform Has ACPI GUID Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-03-28 8:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ArmPkg: introduce PlatformHasAcpiLib Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] EmbeddedPkg: introduce EDKII Platform Has Device Tree GUID Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ArmVirtPkg: add PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ArmVirtPkg: add XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ArmVirtPkg: enable AcpiTableDxe and EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL dynamically Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ArmVirtPkg/FdtClientDxe: install DT as sysconfig table in protocol notify Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe: don't expose DT if QEMU provides ACPI Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 22:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ArmVirtPkg: remove PURE_ACPI_BOOT_ENABLE and PcdPureAcpiBoot Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu-vM_FdTUqcGzBU9sBoe9-VYh14FFAj5uqSMGuK34OY_Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox