From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: GOP driver for the VirtIo GPU (virtio-gpu-pci)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:23:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu88k8-ny73XFcBHVD+J9h-Lx-uEqy5VoMnBL5=ZEnH0KA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <147275957055.21562.7750188759462698423@jljusten-ivb>
On 1 September 2016 at 20:52, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-01 11:46:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 09/01/16 20:03, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>
>> > I think there would be value to have a non-VGA device that could still
>> > configure a simple framebuffer. VGA does bring a fair amount of other
>> > baggage.
>>
>> Ah, I see your point. You distinguish "VGA" from "non-VGA device with
>> framebuffer".
>>
>> For this discussion however, this distinction makes no difference. The
>> suggested "non-VGA device with framebuffer" would be broken exactly the
>> same way. In other words, it's not the "other baggage" that is broken,
>> it is the framebuffer.
>>
>
> This is only focusing on the current ARM issue. I'm just pointing out
> that I think virtio gpu without VGA, but with a framebuffer could be
> useful on IA32/X64 as well.
>
> 1. You don't have to deal with the PCI bus
>
> 2. The OS re-enumerating the PCI bus would not break the framebuffer
>
How does adding a framebuffer to virtio-gpu solve any of that?
virtio-gpu is a PCI device as well
> Is there no chance that ARM KVM might someday also be able to support
> a framebuffer?
>
There are workarounds imaginable, but none of them are feasible in
terms. A new revision of the architecture may address this, but that
will take years to turn up in real hardware.
> Obviously this is not too important for IA32/X64 OVMF, because we have
> reasonable alternatives. But, it seems like virtio gpu could be a
> significantly better option for IA32/X64 OVMF if an optional
> framebuffer was possible.
>
IIUC, not having a linear framebuffer was one of the design goals,
since it is essentially a layering violation in the virtio stack.
virtio-gpu is strictly ring based, like other virtio devices.
If you want a framebuffer, you should use virtio-vga. Adding a
framebuffer to virtio-gpu is a step back rather than a step forward.
Also, the loader->OS handover already suffers from the issues you
mention, since the PCI reconfiguration breaks GOP on almost every
platform. The reason that it is less of a concern on ARM is that most
systems use UART as the primary console.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-19 12:49 [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: GOP driver for the VirtIo GPU (virtio-gpu-pci) Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 01/11] OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: don't incorrectly bind virtio-gpu-pci Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] OvmfPkg/Virtio10Dxe: don't bind virtio-vga Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: relax device class requirement for ConOut Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: add type definitions for the virtio GPU device Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe: introduce with Component Name 2 and Driver Binding Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] OvmfPkg: include VirtioGpuDxe in the platform DSC/FDF files Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtQemu: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 13:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe: initialize and tear down VirtIo GPU device Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe: provide functions for sending VirtIo GPU commands Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] OvmfPkg/VirtioGpuDxe: implement EFI_GRAPHICS_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] ArmVirtPkg: remove PcdKludgeMapPciMmioAsCached Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-19 13:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-19 13:06 ` [PATCH 00/11] OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: GOP driver for the VirtIo GPU (virtio-gpu-pci) Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-19 14:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-08-31 20:43 ` Jordan Justen
2016-09-01 7:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-01 16:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-01 16:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-01 18:03 ` Jordan Justen
2016-09-01 18:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-01 19:52 ` Jordan Justen
2016-09-01 20:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-09-01 20:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-01 20:52 ` Jordan Justen
2016-09-01 20:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-05 14:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-08-30 15:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-01 20:32 ` Jordan Justen
2016-09-01 21:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-01 22:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <57CD6463.90903@suse.de>
2016-09-05 12:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <57CD6C25.7000406@suse.de>
2016-09-05 13:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu88k8-ny73XFcBHVD+J9h-Lx-uEqy5VoMnBL5=ZEnH0KA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox