public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ArmVirtPkg/QemuVirtMemInfoLib: remove 1:1 mapping of top of PA range
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:18:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8JjEH6PLBo3yYxH2_qp7xpUx+OJo09nuaVFHNKP-bBPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48e12ce4-8f1d-f60e-19f2-0a4029d8632c@redhat.com>

On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 21:25, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/27/18 18:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 18:26, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/27/18 15:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> Currently, we map DRAM as EFI_MEMORY_WB, and the remainder of the
> >>> entire virtual address space is mapped with EFI_MEMORY_UC attributes,
> >>> regardless of whether any devices actually reside there.
> >>>
> >>> Now that we are relaxing the address space limit to more than 40 bits,
> >>> mapping all that address space actually takes up more space in page
> >>> tables than we have so far made available as temporary RAM. So let's
> >>> get rid of the mapping rather than increasing the available RAM, given
> >>> that the mapping is not particularly useful anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  ArmVirtPkg/Library/QemuVirtMemInfoLib/QemuVirtMemInfoLib.c | 17 +++++------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/QemuVirtMemInfoLib/QemuVirtMemInfoLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/QemuVirtMemInfoLib/QemuVirtMemInfoLib.c
> >>> index 815ca145b644..70863abb2e7b 100644
> >>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/QemuVirtMemInfoLib/QemuVirtMemInfoLib.c
> >>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/QemuVirtMemInfoLib/QemuVirtMemInfoLib.c
> >>> @@ -73,21 +73,14 @@ ArmVirtGetMemoryMap (
> >>>    VirtualMemoryTable[1].Length       = VirtualMemoryTable[0].PhysicalBase;
> >>>    VirtualMemoryTable[1].Attributes   = ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> >>>
> >>> -  // Peripheral space after DRAM
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[2].PhysicalBase = VirtualMemoryTable[0].Length + VirtualMemoryTable[1].Length;
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[2].VirtualBase  = VirtualMemoryTable[2].PhysicalBase;
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[2].Length       = TopOfAddressSpace -
> >>> -                                       VirtualMemoryTable[2].PhysicalBase;
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[2].Attributes   = ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_DEVICE;
> >>> -
> >>>    // Remap the FD region as normal executable memory
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[3].PhysicalBase = PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress);
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[3].VirtualBase  = VirtualMemoryTable[3].PhysicalBase;
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[3].Length       = FixedPcdGet32 (PcdFdSize);
> >>> -  VirtualMemoryTable[3].Attributes   = ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK;
> >>> +  VirtualMemoryTable[2].PhysicalBase = PcdGet64 (PcdFdBaseAddress);
> >>> +  VirtualMemoryTable[2].VirtualBase  = VirtualMemoryTable[2].PhysicalBase;
> >>> +  VirtualMemoryTable[2].Length       = FixedPcdGet32 (PcdFdSize);
> >>> +  VirtualMemoryTable[2].Attributes   = ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK;
> >>>
> >>>    // End of Table
> >>> -  ZeroMem (&VirtualMemoryTable[4], sizeof (ARM_MEMORY_REGION_DESCRIPTOR));
> >>> +  ZeroMem (&VirtualMemoryTable[3], sizeof (ARM_MEMORY_REGION_DESCRIPTOR));
> >>>
> >>>    *VirtualMemoryMap = VirtualMemoryTable;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>
> >> (1) This supplants your other series "[PATCH v2 00/13] ArmPkg, ArmVirtPkg: lift 40-bit IPA space limit" minimally due to a contextual conflict; is that right?
> >>
> >
> > Not quite. It complements it, in the sense that is should fix the
> > issue reported by Eric when mapping the entire address 48-bit address
> > space.
>
> Oh, you meant this one *on top* of that? In particular, on top of:
>
> [edk2] [PATCH v2 11/13] ArmVirtPkg/QemuVirtMemInfoLib: ignore
>                         PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize
>
> That wasn't clear to me, sorry.
>

No, the other way around actually :-)

Apologies, I managed to confuse myself a bit as well, so I understand
this may be slightly difficult to follow.

> If this one comes on top of the v2 13-part series, do you ultimately
> need v2 11/13 as a separate patch -- in that form anyway? It seems that
> you could squash this patch into v2 11/13, and eliminate the dependency
> on PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize *by* killing the entry that maps the Peripheral
> space after DRAM.
>

Indeed. So after applying these two patches, I will need to respin
that series once more, and now that I think of it, it might make sense
to simplify those changes signficantly, given that only the Xen code
needs to access the CPU's capability registers in the platform MMU
setup code.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27 14:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] ArmVirtPkg: remove high peripheral space mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ArmVirtPkg/FdtPciHostBridgeLib: map ECAM and I/O spaces in GCD memory map Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-27 15:28   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-27 17:40   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-27 17:47     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ArmVirtPkg/QemuVirtMemInfoLib: remove 1:1 mapping of top of PA range Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-27 17:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-27 17:52     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-27 20:25       ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-27 21:18         ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2018-11-28 12:12           ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8JjEH6PLBo3yYxH2_qp7xpUx+OJo09nuaVFHNKP-bBPA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox