Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: Add MMU Library suitable for use in S-EL0.

[Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 11:04, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue Nov 27, 2018 at 11:00:51AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 10:58, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue Nov 27, 2018 at 10:28:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:50, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue Nov 27, 2018 at 09:38:24AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:36, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hi Ard,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue Nov 27, 2018 at 09:14:52AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 07:20, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Standalone MM environment runs in S-EL0 in AArch64 on ARM Standard
> > > > > > > > > Platforms. Privileged firmware e.g. ARM Trusted Firmware sets up its
> > > > > > > > > architectural context including the initial translation tables for the
> > > > > > > > > S-EL1/EL0 translation regime. The MM environment will still request ARM
> > > > > > > > > TF to change the memory attributes of memory regions during
> > > > > > > > > initialization.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Standalone MM image is a FV that encapsulates the MM foundation
> > > > > > > > > and drivers. These are PE-COFF images with data and text segments.
> > > > > > > > > To initialise the MM environment, Arm Trusted Firmware has to create
> > > > > > > > > translation tables with sane default attributes for the memory
> > > > > > > > > occupied by the FV. This library sends SVCs to ARM Trusted Firmware
> > > > > > > > > to request memory permissions change for data and text segments.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This patch adds a simple MMU library suitable for execution in S-EL0 and
> > > > > > > > > requesting memory permissions change operations from Arm Trusted Firmware.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > >  ArmPkg/ArmPkg.dec                                                                                                                                       |   1 +
> > > > > > > > >  ArmVirtPkg/Library/XenArmGenericTimerVirtCounterLib/XenArmGenericTimerVirtCounterLib.inf => ArmPkg/Library/StandaloneMmMmuLib/ArmMmuStandaloneMmLib.inf |  23 +--
> > > > > > > > >  ArmPkg/Include/Library/{ArmMmuLib.h => StandaloneMmMmuLib.h}                                                                                            |  38 +---
> > > > > > > > >  ArmPkg/Library/StandaloneMmMmuLib/Aarch64/ArmMmuStandaloneMmLib.c                                                                                       | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > >  4 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +#endif /* __STANDALONEMM_MMU_LIB__ */
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/StandaloneMmMmuLib/Aarch64/ArmMmuStandaloneMmLib.c b/ArmPkg/Library/StandaloneMmMmuLib/Aarch64/ArmMmuStandaloneMmLib.c
> > > > > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > > > > index 000000000000..d7d87b7d5d69
> > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/StandaloneMmMmuLib/Aarch64/ArmMmuStandaloneMmLib.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
> > > > > > > > > +/** @file
> > > > > > > > > +*  File managing the MMU for ARMv8 architecture in S-EL0
> > > > > > > > > +*
> > > > > > > > > +*  Copyright (c) 2017 - 2018, ARM Limited. All rights reserved.
> > > > > > > > > +*
> > > > > > > > > +*  This program and the accompanying materials
> > > > > > > > > +*  are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD License
> > > > > > > > > +*  which accompanies this distribution.  The full text of the license may be found at
> > > > > > > > > +*  http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
> > > > > > > > > +*
> > > > > > > > > +*  THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS,
> > > > > > > > > +*  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
> > > > > > > > > +*
> > > > > > > > > +**/
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +#include <Uefi.h>
> > > > > > > > > +#include <Chipset/AArch64.h>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why do you need this include? If you can drop it, can you also make
> > > > > > > > the library generic (i.e., supporting ARM as well as AArch64) ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (apologies for not spotting this before)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can remove the header file if it is superfluous. But regarding your
> > > > > > > comment on making this code generic for Arm as well, i guess we
> > > > > > > can work on refactoring the code when/if we actually require to
> > > > > > > support this on Arm. I am not sure if we are going to have a use-case
> > > > > > > for StandaloneMM on Arm. Currently, we are only supporting it on
> > > > > > > Aarch64 based platforms. Is that fine. Please let me know. Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd strongly prefer this code to be generic if you are not using any
> > > > > > AArch64 specific facilities.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AFAICT, we'd simply need to move the file out of the AArch64 directory
> > > > > > and rename [Sources.AARCH64] to [Sources] in the .inf file if the
> > > > > > header dependency is indeed superfluous.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a couple of places where we use something like
> > > > > ARM_SVC_ID_SP_GET_MEM_ATTRIBUTES_AARCH64. Apart from this, it is
> > > > > generic.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > And how do these deviate from their AArch32 counterparts?
> > >
> > > ARM_SVC_ID_SP_GET_MEM_ATTRIBUTES_AARCH64 is passing a SMC64 based smc
> > > call as an argument to S-EL1 shim layer, which will subsequently make
> > > an smc call. We have a couple of functions (GetMemoryPermissions and
> > > RequestMemoryPermissionChange) which are passing these SMC64 based smc
> > > id's. I believe we would be required to define separate Function Id's
> > > for Arm. Hence we would still be required to have these functions
> > > defined under an Aarch64 directory.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree that ARM support is not essential right now, or perhaps never.
> > > > But I would like to understand the differences before I sign off on
> > > > this.
> > >
> > > Ok. I understand your argument to make this generic, but given that it
> > > mostly would never be used on 32-bit Arm platforms, i thought we can
> > > make these changes when we have that scenario. But if you insist, i
> > > will make the changes. Please let me know. Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > No that's fine. I was just trying to assess how many changes would be required.
>
> So, just for my understanding, i can post a v5 for this patch only
> with removal of the header file, if superfluous. Is that right.
>

Yes