From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe: allow guest level ACPI disable override
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:52:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8WmZJxLzDnfFXvKc-d6fXHyRjjA8ojczxXup2gGssBeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3ab9b91-8e0f-52ab-bb3a-53bd0cacf17c@arm.com>
On 31 March 2017 at 10:20, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
> On 30/03/17 09:40, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 29 March 2017 at 20:35, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/29/17 21:10, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> How on earth is having two ways to disable ACPI rather than one going
>>>> to cause fragmentation? Unlike v1, this patch does not allow you to
>>>> expose both DT and ACPI tables at the same time.
>>>
>>> Oopsie daisy. You actually updated the commit message too. (I have now
>>> formally diffed v1 vs. v2, including commit msg -- I generally do that
>>> when reviewing incremental versions of patches, but it has been a very
>>> long day, and I failed to get my mind off the track set up by v1). I got
>>> really no good explanation for missing the fundamental logic change
>>> between v1 and v2. As you say, version 2 preserves the mutual exclusion
>>> between DT and ACPI that I'm so annoyingly obsessed about. Thank you for
>>> the update.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Laszlo. I am glad we have a solution we can both live with.
>>
>> I will wait for Marc to confirm that this works as expected for him.
>
> [ This email won't make it on the edk2 list because it filters out
> non-subscribers. Boo! ]
>
> This patch does a very good job at restoring a functionality I'd have
> otherwise lost. So for the record:
>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>
Thanks all. Pushed as 7e5f1b673870, with the commit log expanded to
explain how to remove the variable again (as requested by Laszlo)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 17:50 [PATCH v2] ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe: allow guest level ACPI disable override Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-29 18:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-29 19:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-29 19:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-30 8:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 16:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-31 10:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <e3ab9b91-8e0f-52ab-bb3a-53bd0cacf17c@arm.com>
2017-03-31 9:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-31 10:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-31 10:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-31 10:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-31 10:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8WmZJxLzDnfFXvKc-d6fXHyRjjA8ojczxXup2gGssBeA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox