From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com)" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check.
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 12:09:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8jxoRWg2a_xXxzAqToVR_+YGAx8TnF8hqjbXC21EtR1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E3B4596@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 06:38, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and Laszlo to collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
>
Laszlo may disagree with me, but I think that it is not always
necessary to resend the entire series when only a single patch
changes. It does depend on the situation, though: if it is a trivial
patch in a more complicated series then it might make little sense. In
other case, just resending the whole thing is probably better.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wu, Jiaxin
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:32 PM
> > To: Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check.
> >
> > Just confirmed with Liming, we don't need to seed the full series patches if only one is updated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > jiaxin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fu, Siyuan
> > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:29 PM
> > > To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>;
> > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
> > > unnecessary NULL pointer check.
> > >
> > > Hi, Jiaxin
> > >
> > > Yes the full patch series is needed for a v2 version.
> > >
> > > And also, why you removed the "(Instance->Token != NULL)" check in the if
> > > condition?
> > >
> > > BestRegards
> > > Fu Siyuan
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Wu, Hao A
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:22 PM
> > > > To: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Gao,
> > > > Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
> > > unnecessary NULL
> > > > pointer check.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jiaxin,
> > > >
> > > > A comment that is not related with the content of the patch itself:
> > > > Please help to send the full patch series when a new version is needed.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Hao Wu
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Wu, Jiaxin
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:16 PM
> > > > > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > > > > Cc: Ye, Ting; Fu, Siyuan; Wu, Hao A; Gao, Liming; Wu, Jiaxin
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
> > > unnecessary
> > > > > NULL pointer check.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2: The DHCP Instance might be destroyed in PxeDhcpDone. So,
> > > > > we need safe-delete.
> > > > >
> > > > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the value of Instance is retrieved from the list Entry,
> > > > > it can't be the NULL pointer, so just remove the unnecessary
> > > > > check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Ye Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Fu Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Wu Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Gao Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > > > > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c | 11 ++++-----
> > > --
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
> > > > > b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
> > > > > index 98a22a77b4..780f8b4224 100644
> > > > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
> > > > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
> > > > > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> > > > > /** @file
> > > > > EFI DHCP protocol implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Copyright (c) 2006 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> > > > > +Copyright (c) 2006 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> > > > > This program and the accompanying materials
> > > > > are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the
> > > BSD
> > > > > License
> > > > > which accompanies this distribution. The full text of the license may be
> > > > > found at
> > > > > http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -1646,16 +1646,13 @@ ON_EXIT:
> > > > > //
> > > > > // Iterate through all the DhcpSb Children.
> > > > > //
> > > > > NET_LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE (Entry, Next, &DhcpSb->Children) {
> > > > > Instance = NET_LIST_USER_STRUCT (Entry, DHCP_PROTOCOL, Link);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if ((Instance != NULL) && (Instance->Token != NULL)) {
> > > > > - Instance->Timeout--;
> > > > > - if (Instance->Timeout == 0) {
> > > > > - PxeDhcpDone (Instance);
> > > > > - }
> > > > > + Instance->Timeout--;
> > > > > + if (Instance->Timeout == 0) {
> > > > > + PxeDhcpDone (Instance);
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > return ;
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.17.1.windows.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-18 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 5:16 [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check Jiaxin Wu
2019-01-18 5:22 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-18 5:29 ` Fu, Siyuan
2019-01-18 5:31 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2019-01-18 5:38 ` Gao, Liming
2019-01-18 11:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-01-19 1:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-20 18:25 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2019-01-21 12:53 ` Gao, Liming
2019-01-21 13:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-01-21 21:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-21 22:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8jxoRWg2a_xXxzAqToVR_+YGAx8TnF8hqjbXC21EtR1w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox