* [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe: preserve non-exec permissions on newly added regions
@ 2017-02-28 13:56 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 21:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2017-02-28 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: edk2-devel, lersek; +Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Using DxeServices::SetMemorySpaceAttributes to set cacheability
attributes has the side effect of stripping permission attributes,
given that those are bits in the same bitfield, and so setting the
Attributes argument to EFI_MEMORY_WB implies not setting EFI_MEMORY_XP
or EFI_MEMORY_RO attributes.
In fact, the situation is even worse, given that the descriptor returned
by DxeServices::GetMemorySpaceDescriptor does not reflect the permission
attributes that may have been set by the preceding call to
DxeServices::AddMemorySpace if PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy has been
configured to map EfiConventionalMemory with non-executable permissions.
Note that this applies equally to the non-executable stack and to PE/COFF
sections that may have been mapped with R-X or RW- permissions. This is
due to the ambiguity in the meaning of the EFI_MEMORY_RO/EFI_MEMORY_XP
attributes when used in the GCD memory map, i.e., between signifying
that an underlying RAM region has the controls to be configures as
read-only or non-executable, and signifying that the contents of a
certain UEFI memory region allow them to be mapped with certain
restricted permissions.
So let's check the policy in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy directly,
and set the EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute if appropriate for
EfiConventionalMemory regions.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf | 1 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
index 22f738279b20..853660437cb0 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
UINTN AddressCells, SizeCells;
UINT64 CurBase;
UINT64 CurSize;
+ UINT64 Attributes;
Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,
(VOID **)&FdtClient);
@@ -77,8 +78,21 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
continue;
}
- Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (CurBase, CurSize,
- EFI_MEMORY_WB);
+ //
+ // Take care not to strip any permission attributes that will have been
+ // set by DxeCore on the region we just added if a strict permission
+ // policy is in effect for EfiConventionalMemory regions.
+ // Unfortunately, we cannot interrogate the GCD memory space map for
+ // those permissions, since they are not recorded there (for historical
+ // reasons), so check the policy directly.
+ //
+ Attributes = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
+ if ((PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) &
+ (1UL << (UINT32)EfiConventionalMemory)) != 0) {
+ Attributes |= EFI_MEMORY_XP;
+ }
+
+ Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (CurBase, CurSize, Attributes);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR,
diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
index 3661cfd8c80c..89c743ebe058 100644
--- a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
+++ b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ [Protocols]
[Pcd]
gArmTokenSpaceGuid.PcdSystemMemoryBase
+ gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
[Depex]
gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid AND gFdtClientProtocolGuid
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe: preserve non-exec permissions on newly added regions
2017-02-28 13:56 [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe: preserve non-exec permissions on newly added regions Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2017-02-28 21:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-01 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2017-02-28 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ard Biesheuvel, edk2-devel
On 02/28/17 14:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Using DxeServices::SetMemorySpaceAttributes to set cacheability
> attributes has the side effect of stripping permission attributes,
> given that those are bits in the same bitfield, and so setting the
> Attributes argument to EFI_MEMORY_WB implies not setting EFI_MEMORY_XP
> or EFI_MEMORY_RO attributes.
>
> In fact, the situation is even worse, given that the descriptor returned
> by DxeServices::GetMemorySpaceDescriptor does not reflect the permission
> attributes that may have been set by the preceding call to
> DxeServices::AddMemorySpace if PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy has been
> configured to map EfiConventionalMemory with non-executable permissions.
>
> Note that this applies equally to the non-executable stack and to PE/COFF
> sections that may have been mapped with R-X or RW- permissions. This is
> due to the ambiguity in the meaning of the EFI_MEMORY_RO/EFI_MEMORY_XP
> attributes when used in the GCD memory map, i.e., between signifying
> that an underlying RAM region has the controls to be configures as
s/configures/configured/
> read-only or non-executable, and signifying that the contents of a
> certain UEFI memory region allow them to be mapped with certain
> restricted permissions.
>
> So let's check the policy in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy directly,
> and set the EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute if appropriate for
> EfiConventionalMemory regions.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
> index 22f738279b20..853660437cb0 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
> UINTN AddressCells, SizeCells;
> UINT64 CurBase;
> UINT64 CurSize;
> + UINT64 Attributes;
>
> Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,
> (VOID **)&FdtClient);
> @@ -77,8 +78,21 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
> continue;
> }
>
> - Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (CurBase, CurSize,
> - EFI_MEMORY_WB);
> + //
> + // Take care not to strip any permission attributes that will have been
> + // set by DxeCore on the region we just added if a strict permission
> + // policy is in effect for EfiConventionalMemory regions.
> + // Unfortunately, we cannot interrogate the GCD memory space map for
> + // those permissions, since they are not recorded there (for historical
> + // reasons), so check the policy directly.
> + //
> + Attributes = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
> + if ((PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) &
> + (1UL << (UINT32)EfiConventionalMemory)) != 0) {
I think you should be using 1ULL here as constant, for consistency, as
in ARM and (somewhat uselessly here) in Ia32 builds, 1UL won't have type
UINT64 (= unsigned long long).
But then again, 1ULL cannot be portably shifted with << (we can only do
that up to UINTN), so ultimately I suggest LShiftU64() here.
Or else, if we're sure that it's going to fit in a UINT32, use "1U".
With those fixed up:
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Laszlo
> + Attributes |= EFI_MEMORY_XP;
> + }
> +
> + Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (CurBase, CurSize, Attributes);
>
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR,
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
> index 3661cfd8c80c..89c743ebe058 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ [Protocols]
>
> [Pcd]
> gArmTokenSpaceGuid.PcdSystemMemoryBase
> + gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
>
> [Depex]
> gEfiCpuArchProtocolGuid AND gFdtClientProtocolGuid
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe: preserve non-exec permissions on newly added regions
2017-02-28 21:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2017-03-01 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2017-03-01 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek; +Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
On 28 February 2017 at 21:14, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/28/17 14:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Using DxeServices::SetMemorySpaceAttributes to set cacheability
>> attributes has the side effect of stripping permission attributes,
>> given that those are bits in the same bitfield, and so setting the
>> Attributes argument to EFI_MEMORY_WB implies not setting EFI_MEMORY_XP
>> or EFI_MEMORY_RO attributes.
>>
>> In fact, the situation is even worse, given that the descriptor returned
>> by DxeServices::GetMemorySpaceDescriptor does not reflect the permission
>> attributes that may have been set by the preceding call to
>> DxeServices::AddMemorySpace if PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy has been
>> configured to map EfiConventionalMemory with non-executable permissions.
>>
>> Note that this applies equally to the non-executable stack and to PE/COFF
>> sections that may have been mapped with R-X or RW- permissions. This is
>> due to the ambiguity in the meaning of the EFI_MEMORY_RO/EFI_MEMORY_XP
>> attributes when used in the GCD memory map, i.e., between signifying
>> that an underlying RAM region has the controls to be configures as
>
> s/configures/configured/
>
>> read-only or non-executable, and signifying that the contents of a
>> certain UEFI memory region allow them to be mapped with certain
>> restricted permissions.
>>
>> So let's check the policy in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy directly,
>> and set the EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute if appropriate for
>> EfiConventionalMemory regions.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.inf | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
>> index 22f738279b20..853660437cb0 100644
>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe/HighMemDxe.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
>> UINTN AddressCells, SizeCells;
>> UINT64 CurBase;
>> UINT64 CurSize;
>> + UINT64 Attributes;
>>
>> Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,
>> (VOID **)&FdtClient);
>> @@ -77,8 +78,21 @@ InitializeHighMemDxe (
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> - Status = gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes (CurBase, CurSize,
>> - EFI_MEMORY_WB);
>> + //
>> + // Take care not to strip any permission attributes that will have been
>> + // set by DxeCore on the region we just added if a strict permission
>> + // policy is in effect for EfiConventionalMemory regions.
>> + // Unfortunately, we cannot interrogate the GCD memory space map for
>> + // those permissions, since they are not recorded there (for historical
>> + // reasons), so check the policy directly.
>> + //
>> + Attributes = EFI_MEMORY_WB;
>> + if ((PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) &
>> + (1UL << (UINT32)EfiConventionalMemory)) != 0) {
>
> I think you should be using 1ULL here as constant, for consistency, as
> in ARM and (somewhat uselessly here) in Ia32 builds, 1UL won't have type
> UINT64 (= unsigned long long).
>
> But then again, 1ULL cannot be portably shifted with << (we can only do
> that up to UINTN), so ultimately I suggest LShiftU64() here.
>
> Or else, if we're sure that it's going to fit in a UINT32, use "1U".
>
I opted for this solution, given that the RHS is a constant < 32
(EfiConventionalMemory)
> With those fixed up:
>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>
Pushed, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-01 11:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-28 13:56 [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg/HighMemDxe: preserve non-exec permissions on newly added regions Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 21:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-01 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox