From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms 2/5] Silicon/SynQuacer: tweak PCI I/O windows for ACPI/Linux support
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:30:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9FCKcM22vH1DsY_-=KYJUrw6x8mhx6w0nYuuy41q_EUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228162611.v6h4ll666u4gmf7e@bivouac.eciton.net>
On 28 February 2018 at 16:26, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:20:14AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> ACPI is not able to describe PCI resource windows that involve both type
>> and address translation (i.e., for I/O windows on architectures that do
>> not support port I/O natively), and so the ACPI/Linux code has a hard
>> time performing the resource allocation in such cases. For instance, the
>> secondary I/O window we implement on SynQuacer:
>>
>> I/O 0x10000 ... 0x1ffff -> 0x77f00000
>>
>> is misinterpreted by Linux, and results in the MMIO range starting at
>> 0x77f10000 to be mapped for I/O port access to this range.
>>
>> This can be mitigated by using the same PCI range for I/O port access
>> on both RCs., i.e., 0x0 ... 0xffff. This configuration can be represented
>> using both DT and ACPI, and will work as expected in Linux, since it only
>> involves type translation and not address translation.
>>
>> However, there is a downside: EDK2 does not cope with I/O address
>> translation in the generic PCI host bridge driver, and so it does
>> not allow two regions 0x0 ... 0xffff to be configured.
>>
>> So in addition, let's reduce the windows declared to the UEFI PCI layer
>> to 0x0 ... 0x7fff and 0x8000 ... 0xffff.
>
> ", able to cover windows witha single 64KB page."?
>
??
>> This leaves ample room for I/O
>> BARs (which nobody uses anymore anyway), and allows UEFI and the OS to
>> share the same static configuration of the PCIe BAR windows.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Heyi Gui is currently implementing support for address translation in
>> the generic PCI host bridge driver, so hopefully, limiting the I/O
>> ranges in UEFI is something we can revert shortly.
>>
>> Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/DeviceTree/SynQuacer.dtsi | 2 +-
>> Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Include/Platform/Pcie.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
>> Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Library/SynQuacerPciHostBridgeLib/SynQuacerPciHostBridgeLibConstructor.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/DeviceTree/SynQuacer.dtsi b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/DeviceTree/SynQuacer.dtsi
>> index 05d1673a5c2b..6eb5fd9430cb 100644
>> --- a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/DeviceTree/SynQuacer.dtsi
>> +++ b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/DeviceTree/SynQuacer.dtsi
>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@
>> bus-range = <0x0 0x7e>;
>> #address-cells = <3>;
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> - ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00010000 0x00 0x77f00000 0x0 0x00010000>,
>> + ranges = <0x1000000 0x00 0x00000000 0x00 0x77f00000 0x0 0x00010000>,
>> <0x2000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x0 0x08000000>,
>> <0x3000000 0x3f 0x00000000 0x3f 0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
>>
>> diff --git a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Include/Platform/Pcie.h b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Include/Platform/Pcie.h
>> index 2d3d5cd91be0..ee57377ac3be 100644
>> --- a/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Include/Platform/Pcie.h
>> +++ b/Silicon/Socionext/SynQuacer/Include/Platform/Pcie.h
>> @@ -23,12 +23,12 @@
>>
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_BUSNUM_MIN 0x0
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_BUSNUM_MAX 0x7e
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_BUSNUM_RANGE 0x7f
>>
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MIN 0x0
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MAX 0xffff
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_SIZE 0x10000
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MAX 0x7fff
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MEMBASE 0x67f00000
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MEMSIZE SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_SIZE
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MEMSIZE 0x10000
>>
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_MMIO32_MIN 0x68000000
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_MMIO32_MAX 0x6fffffff
>> @@ -45,12 +45,12 @@
>>
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_BUSNUM_MIN 0x0
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_BUSNUM_MAX 0x7e
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_BUSNUM_RANGE 0x7f
>>
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MIN 0x10000
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MAX 0x1ffff
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_SIZE 0x10000
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MIN 0x8000
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MAX 0xffff
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MEMBASE 0x77f00000
>> -#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MEMSIZE SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_SIZE
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MEMSIZE 0x10000
>>
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_MMIO32_MIN 0x78000000
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_MMIO32_MAX 0x7fffffff
>> @@ -65,4 +65,8 @@
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SLOT1_LOCATION SYNQUACER_PCI_LOCATION(0, 1, 3)
>> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_SLOT2_LOCATION SYNQUACER_PCI_LOCATION(0, 1, 7)
>>
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_BASE 0x0
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_LIMIT 0xffff
>> +#define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_RANGE 0x10000
>
> Would you be greatly opposed to describing these as
>
> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_BASE SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MIN
> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_LIMIT SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MAX
> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_RANGE SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG1_PORTIO_MEMSIZE
> or
> #define SYNQUACER_PCI_OS_IO_RANGE SYNQUACER_PCI_SEG0_PORTIO_MEMSIZE
>
> which aren't conceptually the same, but explicitly describe the
> desired configuration in this case?
>
Sure. And as a bonus, these will still be correct after Heyi's
PciHostbridgeDxe patches get merged and we can move to 0x0..0xffff for
both regions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 9:20 [PATCH edk2-platforms 0/5] SynQuacer ACPI support Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-27 9:20 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms 1/5] Platform/Socionext/DeveloperBox: fix PCIe slot to B/D/F mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-28 16:17 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-28 16:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-28 16:39 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-27 9:20 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms 2/5] Silicon/SynQuacer: tweak PCI I/O windows for ACPI/Linux support Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-28 16:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-28 16:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2018-02-28 16:43 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-28 16:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-27 9:20 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms 3/5] Silicon/SynQuacer: add ACPI drivers and tables Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-27 9:20 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms 4/5] Silicon/SynQuacer/PlatformDxe: add option to enable ACPI mode Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-28 16:32 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-27 9:20 ` [PATCH edk2-platforms 5/5] Silicon/SynQuacer/PlatformDxe: add ACPI description of eMMC Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu9FCKcM22vH1DsY_-=KYJUrw6x8mhx6w0nYuuy41q_EUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox