From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232; helo=mail-it0-x232.google.com; envelope-from=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72DF21B0285D for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f190so3228312ita.5 for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:40:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2ORXGutc/gu0Uv66up/rsT1zdwfIFQpT3aBKdLAWHE0=; b=dvEfLDUw62KzG8OulBbGJ2y4YfSu2nO2LnAZOP+A4l0FxEzOEdWT5u7//nWQQofP5T uCs0UiPM88iDv+GozMoRCFxLntIIDSfPhV4hyABEShLh+TJIVGG3gT9TD6CpYWzwu0Vi vZefb9UeniFTcf049BGbqN3E9Z7NTUNGtTJjQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2ORXGutc/gu0Uv66up/rsT1zdwfIFQpT3aBKdLAWHE0=; b=jnVI7Ja6bPMeUDa+LY6zvuZ5kANropDr5N1jtT6TpKeNV75rY7DYu90HAdJ8U7VJm0 L69RiuLQf6wzxMoLSCgwKER2vVeiuKQsziN7jM7n263M9DjwP79LwA3IgSnN0YDJEQPL rfDnN219XYQQmRSq51pYU0Hq4aeo+2aegSbzinpYDig610Q9r8PRcFnsFYZJIR1mBlFo hUAaTWK/Ebu1OE9hVXjWtInG4YWZRM5zW0qFBiT+15qdsEKZLY34eeRVSHodMnyMScQt 20ccG9HPJq/lnp6k4KFWJrJfd6z6diitUIBsFrVRSNsV0SQZeLXMtytivycWhUxYwa1/ xZRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKoG+qikN3+y9OWypnHZsCSWSrYpmMwkwcfHSw//MvA7PpN5uFC iC1AACjX9kVencoxj/g3vHqsSEstPwXorT3XZR2fEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZnKppXbpvbZMMepkvfnBfyQwG+kF2o/FrW5Lysh2dC687u5SeiFJLuvlleGWBWZxyXE6z2BiExZIIo+wQk864= X-Received: by 10.107.180.18 with SMTP id d18mr1739121iof.52.1512722403406; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:40:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.104.16 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:40:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1512674434-32326-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <1512674434-32326-6-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:40:02 +0000 Message-ID: To: Marcin Wojtas Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Leif Lindholm , Nadav Haklai , Neta Zur Hershkovits , Kostya Porotchkin , Hua Jing , =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIETEhWJyb8Wb?= , Konrad Adamczyk Subject: Re: [platforms: PATCH v2 5/5] Marvell/Drivers: Drop 'PciEmulation' naming X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:35:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 7 December 2017 at 23:08, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > Hi Ard, > > 2017-12-07 20:49 GMT+01:00 Ard Biesheuvel : >> Hi Marcin, >> >> On 7 December 2017 at 19:20, Marcin Wojtas wrote: >>> 'PciEmulation' is not a proper naming for a driver, which >>> uses NonDiscoverableDeviceRegistrationLib for handling >>> the devices attached via internal bus of the SoC. >>> Rename it to MvNonDiscoverableDxe and move under >>> Silicon/Marvell/Drivers directory. >>> >> >> Thank you! >> >>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 >>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas >>> --- >>> Platform/Marvell/Armada70x0Db/Armada70x0Db.fdf | 4 +-- >>> Silicon/Marvell/Armada7k8k/Armada7k8k.dsc.inc | 4 +-- >>> Silicon/Marvell/{PciEmulation/PciEmulation.c => Drivers/NonDiscoverableDevices/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.c} | 26 ++++++++++---------- >>> Silicon/Marvell/{PciEmulation/PciEmulation.inf => Drivers/NonDiscoverableDevices/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.inf} | 8 +++--- >>> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >>> rename Silicon/Marvell/{PciEmulation/PciEmulation.c => Drivers/NonDiscoverableDevices/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.c} (84%) >>> rename Silicon/Marvell/{PciEmulation/PciEmulation.inf => Drivers/NonDiscoverableDevices/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.inf} (91%) >>> >> >> Could we please have >> >> Drivers/MvNonDiscoverableDxe/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.inf >> >> instead? >> > > My intention was to keep a generic naming at the first level inside > the Silicon/Drivers/Marvell: > I2c Net SdMmc Spi > > I can change it in a way you want, but to my taste > MvNonDiscoverableDxe doesn't fully fit the company above. Do you see > any possible compromise? :) > Well, if you want 'generic' at the level below Silicon/Drivers/Marvell, you will still need MvNonDiscoverableDxe/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.inf below that. So Drivers/NonDiscoverable/MvNonDiscoverableDxe/MvNonDiscoverableDxe.inf perhaps?