From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH for-next] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: catch unimplemented extended config space reads
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9MoqGSecB=KvkF3cuSHX+x=uQ4Gy2YD7n-bZyz1AZeRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604214424.456-1-lersek@redhat.com>
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 23:44, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> When assigning a physical PCIe device to a QEMU/KVM guest, PciBusDxe may
> find that the extended config space is not (fully) implemented. In
> LocatePciExpressCapabilityRegBlock(), "CapabilityEntry" may be read as
> 0xFFFF_FFFF at a given config space offset, after which the loop gets
> stuck spinning on offset 0xFFC (the read at offset 0xFFC returns
> 0xFFFF_FFFF most likely as well).
>
> Another scenario (not related to virtualization) for triggering the above
> is when a Conventional PCI bus -- exposed by a PCIe-to-PCI bridge in the
> topology -- intervenes between a PCI Express Root Port and a PCI Express
> Endpoint. The Conventional PCI bus limits the accessible config space of
> the PCI Express Endpoint, even though the endpoint advertizes the PCI
> Express capability. Here's a diagram, courtesy of Alex Williamson:
>
> [PCIe Root Port]--[PCIe-to-PCI]--[PCI-to-PCIe]--[PCIe EP]
> ->| |<- Conventional PCI bus
>
> Catch reads of 0xFFFF_FFFF in LocatePciExpressCapabilityRegBlock(), and
> break out of the scan with a warning message. The function will return
> EFI_NOT_FOUND.
>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Repo: https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
> Branch: pcibus_no_ext_conf
>
> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciCommand.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciCommand.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciCommand.c
> index 214aeecdd40a..6283d602207c 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciCommand.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciCommand.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ LocatePciExpressCapabilityRegBlock (
> break;
> }
>
> + if (CapabilityEntry == MAX_UINT32) {
Should we check here that the offset > 0x100 ? Otherwise, this affects
more than just the extended config space.
> + DEBUG ((
> + DEBUG_WARN,
> + "%a: [%02x|%02x|%02x] failed to access config space at offset 0x%x\n",
> + __FUNCTION__,
> + PciIoDevice->BusNumber,
> + PciIoDevice->DeviceNumber,
> + PciIoDevice->FunctionNumber,
> + CapabilityPtr
> + ));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> CapabilityID = (UINT16) CapabilityEntry;
>
> if (CapabilityID == CapId) {
> --
> 2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
>
>
> ------------
> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
> View/Reply Online (#41893): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41893
> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31931246/1761188
> Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
> Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
> ------------
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 21:44 [PATCH for-next] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: catch unimplemented extended config space reads Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-05 9:12 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-05 9:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-06-05 10:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-06-05 13:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-10 7:03 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-06-11 8:55 ` Ni, Ray
2019-06-11 16:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu9MoqGSecB=KvkF3cuSHX+x=uQ4Gy2YD7n-bZyz1AZeRg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox