From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (mail-wr1-f66.google.com [209.85.221.66])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.5405.1581922933679385395
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:02:14 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=vitAHvFf;
 spf=pass (domain: linaro.org, ip: 209.85.221.66, mailfrom: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org)
Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y17so18223842wrh.5
        for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:02:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=linaro.org; s=google;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=o8KNe1lcn0Mcnf606TwJ/5c03nTQhZnIstZRErtv1lM=;
        b=vitAHvFfEhNbzFNJfAiuQZaPFpJ0fJzusw9pfdsq6LCFbEC3bqD+X9PLN9uzZcs5bA
         Um7WPDsKHhIhRsrgaTnBwOXg9rouPxY+cfOp/ihEorGdOSDZNpxtLk1UGmdLW9S/cg6m
         kUa9DsWQ6AqTiaHIs5CKcVWAex3W5JtL/AoLElAITjtU2YplGPawoO20KmCFcBkXF7Bb
         LWjsI4CTTPr3OaybAy/cEMUjdARGkcVnxtsdhdZab0pI2xW2SbRQbVTUoJYbgsCNBv4s
         LQoOdllQM/1V2XPoACvcfwEKqlffv16Ew6WZ+GlLT+XcgTlHIhmivkNQNppBDmYn7b1L
         x79A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=o8KNe1lcn0Mcnf606TwJ/5c03nTQhZnIstZRErtv1lM=;
        b=LVJNsx7HjC+90K8CRmcUA9XIrWumKjyVWU3lfteH4P2OwLYyNh4U7TJkqiHBs1aWT9
         0xr1QPdcqZgh52iAa+M/yPsgaNvHeAE13yVTxMUoigzWF+RXnw7QZsNomx8DinMVAdYW
         3+A31NFcOlrvWIfFTyHx9IfUVhnrDU5HIHQFJSTQgG6n4CUjrcHIRzQCRcseQ/AbKuXz
         83PKvHVZT4Eb8yfNPRUBF6QBs119Q6zAr/QAzsYoXcCMYZwp5UeOp3qhRnB1qW5Pe9FV
         3dtHbfDI62lK1duwDN/hd6Q2aIHZSLvGAP9uS9FIj0buDeekbNiRlnK44ngjmStTMV0W
         /DYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdbpwIPkFggDLJaIL39b2W5zeL9AwsJQNT/jwFDX3mE2mVuNpK
	Eg4jxiCYf9adCJJLStTo9hR55VZi/xin7HVgjhca7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2rREQ6RIE86jVRGKT+nFvQq01VuDsn2mrXN4m7X3XqzPInYBA1p9CYs1mw/CIpVFfJWrV2BsxqSpS8Ts3kGI=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:8564:: with SMTP id 91mr20765329wrh.252.1581922932258;
 Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:02:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200130102826.20759-1-gaurav.jain@nxp.com> <CAKv+Gu9rvFWihw2totrbbv19dAAQJ+FLKWbwz4U5u6hQ3b66ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <DB7PR04MB4091F9E6B440A54D2B3ACBC7E7070@DB7PR04MB4091.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <DB7PR04MB409158D419C5A089FC5E0E00E7180@DB7PR04MB4091.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAKv+Gu-vG_wQg4P1Ouw=LrsNYo5TsxYhOrFJefWE4WU7kdJb9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <AM6PR04MB40872D87FB6B56D34B5C2002E7160@AM6PR04MB4087.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAKv+Gu_zmkwGvyFmVNj4pwwUD8X=G3DgN2pJUq=mu-79kFko_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_zmkwGvyFmVNj4pwwUD8X=G3DgN2pJUq=mu-79kFko_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:02:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9NXHYikOvn88WLyFpd9+ERMhcM1EbR-xSygUZJmR6TDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg: Fixed Asserts in SCT Runtime Services test.
To: Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@nxp.com>
Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>, 
	Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 07:56, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wr=
ote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 07:25, Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ard
> >
> > I have also checked UEFI Shell Specification Version 2.2(https://uefi.o=
rg/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Shell_2_2.pdf)
> > For date command the range of valid years is from 1998=E2=80=932099 (on=
 page 121)
> >
> > So Range of valid years is conflicting in UEFI Spec and UEFI Shell Spec=
.
> > I think UEFI spec needs to be corrected. What are your thoughts?
> >
>
> Page 121 does not mention data. Page 111 does, and tells me that a
> two-digit year is interpreted as 199x or 20xx, and a four digit year
> is interpreted as is.
>
> How exactly does that conflict with the UEFI spec?
>

OK, so I found this on page 111:

"""The range of valid years is from 1998=E2=80=932099"""

and so indeed, the Shell 'date' command's year range is narrower than
the UEFI spec's, but that does not make it non-compliant.