public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
	 "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] DXE Memory Protection
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:16:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9NkyfSE1p+x=s6YB0tU3gB5r=uw6RUFw_L+uLq_9jjcQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8ECAA8@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 10 February 2017 at 12:59, Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
>
>
>
> Mike/Vincent also mentioned that FW does not own page tables after
> ExitBootServices(), so the OS would have to relax NX protection of RT code
> pages across SVA.
>
> Or delay setting NX protections on RT code pages until after SVA.
>
>
>
> I agree with you that we can mark RT region to be RW.
>
> Here is the pseudo code I plan to put to CoreExitBootServices().
>
>
>
> =======================
>
> VOID
>
> MemoryprotectionExitBootServicesCallback (
>
>   VOID
>
>   )
>
> {
>
>   EFI_RUNTIME_IMAGE_ENTRY       *RuntimeImage;
>
>   LIST_ENTRY                    *Link;
>
>
>
>   //
>
>   // We need remove the RT protection, because RT relocation need write code
> segment
>
>   // at SetVirtualAddressMap(). We cannot assume OS/Loader has taken over
> page table at that time.
>
>   //
>
>   // Firmware does not own page tables after ExitBootServices(), so the OS
> would
>
>   // have to relax protection of RT code pages across
> SetVirtualAddressMap(), or
>
>   // delay setting protections on RT code pages until after
> SetVirtualAddressMap().
>
>   // OS may set protection on RT based upon EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE
> later.
>
>   //
>
>   if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0) {
>
>     for (Link = gRuntime->ImageHead.ForwardLink; Link !=
> &gRuntime->ImageHead; Link = Link->ForwardLink) {
>
>       RuntimeImage = BASE_CR (Link, EFI_RUNTIME_IMAGE_ENTRY, Link);
>
>       SetUefiImageMemoryAttributes ((UINT64)(UINTN)RuntimeImage->ImageBase,
> ALIGN_VALUE(RuntimeImage->ImageSize, EFI_PAGE_SIZE), 0);
>
>     }
>
>   }
>
> }


This looks correct to me, and it is the only place where we can deal
with this situation.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-09  7:20 [PATCH V3 0/4] DXE Memory Protection Jiewen Yao
2017-02-09  7:20 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Add memory attribute setting Jiewen Yao
2017-02-09  7:20 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: Correct EFI_MEMORY_RO usage Jiewen Yao
2017-02-09  7:20 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] MdeModulePkg/dec: add PcdImageProtectionPolicy Jiewen Yao
2017-02-09  7:20 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Add UEFI image protection Jiewen Yao
2017-02-09  7:43 ` [PATCH V3 0/4] DXE Memory Protection Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-09  8:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09  9:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09  9:22       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 13:19         ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-09 13:51           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 14:08             ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-09 14:55               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 15:27                 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-09 15:28                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 16:21                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 16:29                       ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-09 16:30                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-09 16:48                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10  2:26                             ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-10  6:34                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10  6:41                                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 11:32                                   ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-10 11:42                                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-10 12:59                                       ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-10 14:16                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-02-09 14:23 ` Yao, Jiewen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu9NkyfSE1p+x=s6YB0tU3gB5r=uw6RUFw_L+uLq_9jjcQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox