From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Auger Eric" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: take the CPU supported maximum PA space into account
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:50:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9rG+cnX11FrCr5o4RJ2kgDzVDf22shZLEvpNzGVPFGQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126174555.rv7xul3sxvvdposh@bivouac.eciton.net>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 18:46, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > In preparation of permitting the virt code to define a larger PA space
> > size via gEmbeddedTokenSpaceGuid.PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize than what the
> > CPU actually supports, take the CPU's capabilities into account when
> > setting up the page tables. This is necessary because KVM will shortly
> > support variable PA space sizes, and to support running the same UEFI
> > binaries regardless of that limit, PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize needs to be
> > treated as an upper bound rather than a fixed size.
>
> Why do we keep PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize at all? (I.e., rather than just
> using the probed value?
> Mainly for the purpose of being able to restrict ourselves to 32/48
> bits?
>
> If we keep it, should we rename
> PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize -> PcdPrePiCpuMemoryBits
> and
> PcdPrePiCpuIoSize -> PcdPrePiCpuIoBits
> ?
>
> Argument against this would be that later consumers still refer to
> the value extracted from the HOB as SizeOf*Space, and happily shifts
> 1s around by it :|
>
I am reworking this so PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize retains its meaning.
Instead, I will add something like this to ArmLib.h
//
// ARM_MMU_IDMAP_LIMIT defines the maximum size of the identity mapping
// that covers the entire address space when running in UEFI. This is limited
// to what can architecturally be mapped using a 4 KB granule, even if the
// hardware is capable of mapping more using larger pages.
//
#ifdef MDE_CPU_ARM
#define ARM_MMU_IDMAP_LIMIT (MAX_UINT32)
#else
#define ARM_MMU_IDMAP_LIMIT (1ULL << 48)
#endif
and use that in the MMU code as an upper bound in case the CPU supports 52 bits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-26 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-23 12:14 [PATCH 0/5] ArmPkg, ArmVirtPkg: lift 40-bit IPA space limit Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-23 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] ArmPkg/ArmLib: add support for reading the max physical address space size Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <20181123131631.ionb53xqzlyepaue@hawk.localdomain>
2018-11-23 13:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-23 13:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-25 17:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 11:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 18:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-23 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib: take the CPU supported maximum PA space into account Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 9:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 9:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 10:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 11:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 17:45 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-11-26 17:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2018-11-26 17:57 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-11-23 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] ArmVirtPkg: refactor reading of the physical address space size Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 10:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-23 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] ArmVirtPkg: disregard PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize PCD when sizing the GCD space Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 10:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 11:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-23 12:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] ArmVirtPkg: revert PcdPrePiCpuMemorySize to is default value of 48 Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <20181123133553.4o6rcbmebggn2ne7@hawk.localdomain>
2018-11-23 13:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 10:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-25 17:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] ArmPkg, ArmVirtPkg: lift 40-bit IPA space limit Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 9:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 10:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-11-26 11:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu9rG+cnX11FrCr5o4RJ2kgDzVDf22shZLEvpNzGVPFGQQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox