public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
	 Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] Platform/RPi4: allow overriding TF-A binaries during build
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:54:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9zPeJbP09LbhjXGAWBYd64OwUN4XcqMAmEhZBO0y7psg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302144219.10452-2-pete@akeo.ie>

On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 15:42, Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie> wrote:
>
> From: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
>
> For PFTF developers working on the firmware, being able to use a
> local TF-A build without extra extra copy operations ends up being
> very helpful.
>
> This can be accomplished via a TFA_BUILD_ARTIFACTS option passed
> to the edk2 build tool.
>
> If/when the Pi 3 and 4 DSC/FDFs become unified, this will be even
> more important to trivially perform a full clean upstream build
> for either platform, without having to worry about different TF-A
> deliverables - Pi 4 uses bl31.bin, while Pi 3 uses fip.bin and bl1.bin.
>
> A similar Pi 3 patch to follow.
>
> The context for this is the community Raspberry Pi 4 firmware
> project (https://https://rpi4-uefi.dev, https://github.com/pftf),
> which you might have heard already about from Pete Batard, who
> upstreamed much of my previous Pi 3 and Pi 4 enablement patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>

Do we really need this patch? For development, you can put anything
you want here. For doing releases, I'd expect edk2-platforms to be in
sync with edk2-non-osi, given that there are more blobs there than
TF-A, right?



> ---
>  Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc b/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc
> index c039f6df2eb4..1d38f4ab051d 100644
> --- a/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc
> +++ b/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.dsc
> @@ -40,6 +40,20 @@ [Defines]
>    DEFINE DEBUG_PRINT_ERROR_LEVEL = 0x8000004F
>    DEFINE ACPI_BASIC_MODE_ENABLE  = FALSE
>
> +!ifndef TFA_BUILD_ARTIFACTS
> +  #
> +  # Default TF-A binary checked into edk2-non-osi.
> +  #
> +  DEFINE TFA_BUILD_BL31 = Platform/RaspberryPi/$(PLATFORM_NAME)/TrustedFirmware/bl31_pl011.bin
> +!else
> +  #
> +  # Usually we use the checked-in binaries, but for developers working
> +  # on the firmware, being able to use a local TF-A build without extra copy
> +  # operations ends up being very helpful.
> +  #
> +  DEFINE TFA_BUILD_BL31 = $(TFA_BUILD_ARTIFACTS)/bl31.bin
> +!endif
> +
>  ################################################################################
>  #
>  # Library Class section - list of all Library Classes needed by this Platform.
> diff --git a/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf b/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf
> index b2a6ac9e6c66..8e2d6fd49a9d 100644
> --- a/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf
> +++ b/Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ [FD.RPI_EFI]
>  # ATF primary boot image
>  #
>  0x00000000|0x00020000
> -FILE = Platform/RaspberryPi/$(PLATFORM_NAME)/TrustedFirmware/bl31_pl011.bin
> +FILE = $(TFA_BUILD_BL31)
>
>  #
>  # DTB.
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-02 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 14:42 [edk2-devel][RESEND][PATCH 0/2] Resend of the 2 previous RPi patches Pete Batard
2020-03-02 14:42 ` [edk2-devel][RESEND][PATCH 1/2] Platform/RPi4: allow overriding TF-A binaries during build Pete Batard
2020-03-02 14:54   ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-03-02 17:40     ` Andrei Warkentin
2020-03-02 18:13       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-02 14:42 ` [edk2-devel][RESEND][PATCH 2/2] Platform/RPi4/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib: remove dead logo code Pete Batard
2020-03-02 14:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu9zPeJbP09LbhjXGAWBYd64OwUN4XcqMAmEhZBO0y7psg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox