Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers

[Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>]

On 23 November 2017 at 12:55, Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 6:11 PM
>> To: Wu, Hao A
>> Cc: Zeng, Star; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Kinney,
>> Michael D; Gao, Liming; Tian, Feng; Dong, Eric
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers
>>
>> On 13 November 2017 at 03:37, Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Zeng, Star
>> >> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 11:32 AM
>> >> To: Wu, Hao A; Ard Biesheuvel; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> >> leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Kinney, Michael D
>> >> Cc: Gao, Liming; Tian, Feng; Dong, Eric; Zeng, Star
>> >> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers
>> >>
>> >> Hao,
>> >>
>> >> Could you help do the evaluation on this RFC?
>> >
>> > Sure, I will take a look on this.
>> >
>>
>> Any feedback?
>>
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response.
>
> I am still collecting feedbacks internally to see if there are additional hook
> points needed or other features/services that can be added to the SD/MMC
> override protocol.
>
> I think it would be better for this protocol to be general when it is
> introduced, which might avoid changing the protocol frequently later.
>
> What is your thought on this?

Thank you for bringing this up internally. I agree that we should
carefully consider potential use cases now and not later.

Thanks,
Ard.