From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "Cohen, Eugene" <eugene@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] BaseTools/GenFw AARCH64: disregard ADRP instructions that are patched already
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:09:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_S=4Mm3U4vJzEfHhbD=BQK-+rhEv6kEcf+PKOJQqE_sw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107090618.15813-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
(+ Leif, Liming)
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 10:06, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> In order to permit the use of compilers that only implement the small
> code model [which involves the use of ADRP instructions that require
> 4 KB segment alignment] for generating PE/COFF binaries with a small
> footprint, we patch ADRP instructions into ADR instructions while doing
> the ELF to PE/COFF conversion.
>
> As it turns out, the linker may be doing the same, but for different
> reasons: there is a silicon erratum #843419 for ARM Cortex-A53 which
> affects ADRP instructions appearing at a certain offset in memory, and
> one of the mitigations for this erratum is to patch them into ADR
> instructions at link time if the symbol reference is within -/+ 1 MB.
> However, the LD linker fails to update the static relocation tables, and
> so we end up with an ADR instruction in the fully linked binary, but
> with a relocation entry in the RELA section identifying it as an ADRP
> instruction.
>
> Since the linker has already updated the symbol reference, there is no
> handling needed in GenFw for such instructions, and we can simply treat
> it as an ordinary ADR. However, since it is guaranteed to be accompanied
> by an add or load instruction with a LO12 relocation referencing the same
> symbol, the section offset check we apply to ADR instructions is going to
> take place anyway, so we can just disregard the ADR instruction entirely.
>
> Reported-by: Eugene Cohen <eugene@hp.com>
> Suggested-by: Eugene Cohen <eugene@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> index d574300ac4fe..d623dce1f9da 100644
> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,19 @@ WriteSections64 (
> /* fall through */
>
> case R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21:
> + //
> + // In order to handle Cortex-A53 erratum #843419, the LD linker may
> + // convert ADRP instructions into ADR instructions, but without
> + // updating the static relocation type, and so we may end up here
> + // while the instruction in question is actually ADR. So let's
> + // just disregard it: the section offset check we apply below to
> + // ADR instructions will trigger for its R_AARCH64_xxx_ABS_LO12_NC
> + // companion instruction as well, so it is safe to omit it here.
> + //
> + if ((*(UINT32 *)Targ & BIT31) == 0) {
> + break;
> + }
> +
> //
> // AArch64 PG_H21 relocations are typically paired with ABS_LO12
> // relocations, where a PC-relative reference with +/- 4 GB range is
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-07 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 9:06 [PATCH 1/1] BaseTools/GenFw AARCH64: disregard ADRP instructions that are patched already Ard Biesheuvel
2019-11-07 9:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-11-07 12:17 ` Cohen, Eugene
2019-11-07 16:14 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-11-08 0:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Liming Gao
2019-11-08 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu_S=4Mm3U4vJzEfHhbD=BQK-+rhEv6kEcf+PKOJQqE_sw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox