From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5C582215
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Fri,  3 Mar 2017 05:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id m27so12980254iti.1
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:45:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=tm1lLKAEdxbYUviIcQrb22WkrNUSIy3l9Nrn1WLKCmA=;
 b=ObuIt0q1qYuglPRiviD6jKBbUhS1xNaF1T9KjsfT6+VC9u4jYGgDC/6t2f0slKfNzx
 5vikRTrFouiW4tNvKkKYCVrhLfoqwjedMJ8uv/z5TOcAQEuh0Kc08WtcX6ho+d/7Cyzq
 nrSEJhJyPjx2gq5rpiJDliImyPYxqDPnsmEAI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=tm1lLKAEdxbYUviIcQrb22WkrNUSIy3l9Nrn1WLKCmA=;
 b=jkvpGVMhkc1ZFDZsRMkkPkPD9VLcZPJJL8cY8tC8mGz94N6/Ad+biQf/TV+2ZDJvwv
 usvgcb/YSMHDAWhUa1AjXqe6M0arcdW2m9K3RsZOHp8rBrEfGCtWcOFcnaRa5LKucQm5
 DQ0XKHSIT6Bd4GuX4Qd9GZ1I9Q5OecIKKWPLxWXotwIqkL4JHe2erpcS7O+8P3UL0KfQ
 HbyJkzyD63JKbakN+i3T7JDZ8tuQ9SHFGqET2JSDPA2gh2NSw7DJqMQ03eV7vL03x9Xz
 K/0p4IdiaOCRPgyD7O61R0LNPAKwmphB1LsaEiyfVua6oLo9+OrMjTJz7L4ABKKF0saB
 c7TQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nU/sDbOo6kB2BjiRDBT8Lzm1LKP3hOaPcd7QxduFDh6z9v3HBhI5SkwEpqWTZB8wTNI1pLaESG2KQGufxP
X-Received: by 10.36.118.68 with SMTP id z65mr3181303itb.59.1488548739232;
 Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:45:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.10.27 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 05:45:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F901F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1488543408-27921-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F901F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:45:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_ZMcP6t5V=E7QNgg7P8xUvsXSOMzyWrW9n+UN+RZEj_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>, "Gao,
 Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>, 
 "leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>, "Kinney,
 Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/Uefi: pack EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE struct
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 13:45:40 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com> wrote:
> HI Ard
> Thanks to raise this issue.
>
> I agree with you on pack.
>
> I think there is still some confusing in " The EFI System Table entry must point to an array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value."
>
> I am still not clear if it is a proper way to use "an array of capsule headers" to represent the "an array of capsules".
>
> I recommend we ask USWG to clarify the meaning to avoid misunderstanding.
>

Yes, please.