From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: move PlatformHasAcpiGuid from EmbeddedPkg
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:01:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_niW2tUMXZctF9fS_6mVNY8GAhEvH6JnzzK+dRA3aUTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f581c2b7-764b-641a-959d-8be7c2ab54fb@redhat.com>
On 5 April 2017 at 10:49, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/17 11:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Given the agreement on the edk2-devel regarding the fact that the
>> notion whether or not a 'platform has ACPI' is a universal one, move
>> the PlatformHasAcpi GUID to MdeModulePkg.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
>> ---
>> ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf | 1 +
>> ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf | 1 +
>> EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec | 3 ---
>> EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf | 1 +
>> {EmbeddedPkg => MdeModulePkg}/Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h | 0
>> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 +++
>> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> index 08025f0c3722..5351e741aa41 100644
>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/PlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ [Sources]
>> [Packages]
>> ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPkg.dec
>> EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>> + MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
>> MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
>> OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.dec
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf b/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> index 2833075f65c9..26965c50c12b 100644
>> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe/XenPlatformHasAcpiDtDxe.inf
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ [Sources]
>>
>> [Packages]
>> EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>> + MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
>> MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
>>
>> [LibraryClasses]
>> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec b/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>> index 0bed2736c8c3..a7e127085236 100644
>> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>> @@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ [Guids.common]
>> gFdtHobGuid = { 0x16958446, 0x19B7, 0x480B, { 0xB0, 0x47, 0x74, 0x85, 0xAD, 0x3F, 0x71, 0x6D } }
>> gFdtVariableGuid = { 0x25a4fd4a, 0x9703, 0x4ba9, { 0xa1, 0x90, 0xb7, 0xc8, 0x4e, 0xfb, 0x3e, 0x57 } }
>>
>> - ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasAcpi.h
>> - gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid = { 0xf0966b41, 0xc23f, 0x41b9, { 0x96, 0x04, 0x0f, 0xf7, 0xe1, 0x11, 0x96, 0x5a } }
>> -
>> ## Include/Guid/PlatformHasDeviceTree.h
>> gEdkiiPlatformHasDeviceTreeGuid = { 0x7ebb920d, 0x1aaf, 0x46d9, { 0xb2, 0xaf, 0x54, 0x1e, 0x1d, 0xce, 0x14, 0x8b } }
>>
>> diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
>> index 6268293ca97b..be298ba67c40 100644
>> --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
>> +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Library/PlatformHasAcpiLib/PlatformHasAcpiLib.inf
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ [Sources]
>>
>> [Packages]
>> EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec
>
> I think you can remove "EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec" here.
>
Ah yes. It didn't occur to me to remove the 'home' package here, but I
suppose this library doesn't depend on anything it provides.
> (
>
> I checked all the other INF files being modified as well; it seems that
> "EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec" remains necessary in all other places.
>
> I also grepped all INF files for the GUID -- DtPlatformDxe.inf is
> another user, but it needs no modification.
>
> )
>
> With that update (if it indeed works),
>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 9:38 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: move PlatformHasAcpiGuid from EmbeddedPkg Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-05 9:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-04-05 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-04-05 15:38 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-04-05 16:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu_niW2tUMXZctF9fS_6mVNY8GAhEvH6JnzzK+dRA3aUTw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox