public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
	 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	 "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	 "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
	"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: ignore attribute changes during SyncCacheConfig()
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:33:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_p0_Xh+bEsXC0pg7nh1P=n6bKM3ovAT5yamvB6Lyyv0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170227153227.GD16034@bivouac.eciton.net>

On 27 February 2017 at 15:32, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:38:05PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> To prevent the initial MMU->GCD memory space map synchronization from
>> stripping permissions attributes [which we cannot use in the GCD memory
>> space map, unfortunately], implement the same approach as x86, and ignore
>> SetMemoryAttributes() calls during the time SyncCacheConfig() is in
>> progress. This is a horrible hack, but is currently the only way we can
>> implement strict permissions on arbitrary memory regions [as opposed to
>> PE/COFF text/data sections only]
>
> Sounds like another excellent argument for why this CpuDxe should be
> cosying up with the UefiCpuPkg one longer-term.
>

I suppose so, yes.

>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.c       | 3 +++
>>  ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h       | 1 +
>>  ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuMmuCommon.c | 4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.c
>> index 5aa5b874144a..1955d1dece03 100644
>> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.c
>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>
>>  #include <Guid/IdleLoopEvent.h>
>>
>> +BOOLEAN                   gIsFlushingGCD;
>
> OK, I am unable to not bikeshed this:
> The behaviour you're copying is implemented via a variable called
> mIsFlushingGCD. Why change the prefix? Surely we're not looking to
> export this variable any further in ARM?
>

Because it is not local the one compilation unit, that's all. It is
not in a library, so in that sense, it is guaranteed to remain local
to this module, if that is any consolation.

>>
>>  /**
>>    This function flushes the range of addresses from Start to Start+Length
>> @@ -261,7 +262,9 @@ CpuDxeInitialize (
>>    // and that calls EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL.SetMemoryAttributes, so this code needs to go
>>    // after the protocol is installed
>>    //
>> +  gIsFlushingGCD = TRUE;
>>    SyncCacheConfig (&mCpu);
>> +  gIsFlushingGCD = FALSE;
>>
>>    // If the platform is a MPCore system then install the Configuration Table describing the
>>    // secondary core states
>> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
>> index a00fc3064362..085e4cab2921 100644
>> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuDxe.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>  #include <Protocol/DebugSupportPeriodicCallback.h>
>>  #include <Protocol/LoadedImage.h>
>>
>> +extern BOOLEAN gIsFlushingGCD;
>
> Eew ... this suggest we are.
>
> /
>     Leif
>
>>
>>  /**
>>    This function registers and enables the handler specified by InterruptHandler for a processor
>> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuMmuCommon.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuMmuCommon.c
>> index ebe593d1c325..6dfec7e55888 100644
>> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuMmuCommon.c
>> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe/CpuMmuCommon.c
>> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ CpuSetMemoryAttributes (
>>    UINTN       RegionLength;
>>    UINTN       RegionArmAttributes;
>>
>> +  if (gIsFlushingGCD) {
>> +    return EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +  }
>> +
>>    if ((BaseAddress & (SIZE_4KB - 1)) != 0) {
>>      // Minimum granularity is SIZE_4KB (4KB on ARM)
>>      DEBUG ((EFI_D_PAGE, "CpuSetMemoryAttributes(%lx, %lx, %lx): Minimum ganularity is SIZE_4KB\n", BaseAddress, Length, EfiAttributes));
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-27 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-27 14:38 [PATCH v4 0/7] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: increased memory protection Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] ArmPkg/CpuDxe: ignore attribute changes during SyncCacheConfig() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27 15:32   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-27 15:33     ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-02-27 15:38       ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-27 15:39         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27 15:41           ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] MdeModulePkg/PeiCore: allocate BootServicesCode memory for PE/COFF images Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28  5:42   ` Gao, Liming
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe: use EfiBootServicesCode memory for thunks Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: use separate lock for pool allocations Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28  9:32   ` Gao, Liming
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] MdeModulePkg: define PCD for DXE memory protection policy Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: implement " Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28  9:33   ` Gao, Liming
2017-02-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirt.dsc.inc: enable NX memory protection for all platforms Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28  5:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: increased memory protection Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-28 14:59   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 10:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-28 10:52   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 10:59     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 11:47       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-28 23:46       ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-13  8:43         ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-03-13  8:50           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-13  8:53             ` Michael Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu_p0_Xh+bEsXC0pg7nh1P=n6bKM3ovAT5yamvB6Lyyv0g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox