From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@codeaurora.org>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
Daniil Egranov <daniil.egranov@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] MdeModulePkg/EbxDxe AARCH64: use tail call for EBC to native thunk
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:14:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_rgPcwh66_Le-4fhhx7FFtEr6YHtYfzYP1999yGYQSJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160826125439.GF4715@bivouac.eciton.net>
On 26 August 2016 at 13:54, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:59:04PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Instead of pessimistically copying at least 64 bytes from the VM stack
>> to the native stack, and popping off the register arguments again
>> before doing the native call, try to avoid touching the stack completely
>> if the VM stack frame is < 64 bytes. Also, if the stack frame does exceed
>
> Should this say "does not"?
>
No, if it exceeds 64 bytes, we may have arguments that should be
passed on the stack (but we're not sure, unfortunately, since the VM
stack frame is not annotated, i.e., it could simply be local vars in
the caller) In this case, there is no need to push all arguments onto
the native stack, and pop off the first 8 into registers again, which
is what the original code was doing.
>> 64 bytes, there is no need to copy the first 64 bytes, since we are passing
>> those in registers anyway.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/AArch64/EbcLowLevel.S | 73 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/AArch64/EbcLowLevel.S b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/AArch64/EbcLowLevel.S
>> index cb7a70b5a4f8..d95713e82b0f 100644
>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/AArch64/EbcLowLevel.S
>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EbcDxe/AArch64/EbcLowLevel.S
>> @@ -35,30 +35,67 @@ ASM_GLOBAL ASM_PFX(mEbcInstructionBufferTemplate)
>> //****************************************************************************
>> // UINTN EbcLLCALLEXNative(UINTN FuncAddr, UINTN NewStackPointer, VOID *FramePtr)
>> ASM_PFX(EbcLLCALLEXNative):
>> - stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
>> - stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
>> + mov x8, x0 // Preserve x0
>> + mov x9, x1 // Preserve x1
>>
>> - mov x19, x0
>> - mov x20, sp
>> - sub x2, x2, x1 // Length = NewStackPointer-FramePtr
>> - sub sp, sp, x2
>> - sub sp, sp, #64 // Make sure there is room for at least 8 args in the new stack
>> - mov x0, sp
>> + //
>> + // If the EBC stack frame is smaller than or equal to 64 bytes, we know there
>> + // are no stacked arguments #9 and beyond that we need to copy to the native
>> + // stack. In this case, we can perform a tail call which is much more
>> + // efficient, since there is no need to touch the native stack at all.
>> + //
>> + sub x3, x2, x1 // Length = NewStackPointer - FramePtr
>> + cmp x3, #64
>> + b.gt 1f
>>
>> - bl CopyMem // Sp, NewStackPointer, Length
>> + adr x0, 0f
>> + sub x0, x0, x3, lsr #1
>> + br x0
>>
>> - ldp x0, x1, [sp], #16
>> - ldp x2, x3, [sp], #16
>> - ldp x4, x5, [sp], #16
>> - ldp x6, x7, [sp], #16
>> + ldr x7, [x9, #56]
>> + ldr x6, [x9, #48]
>> + ldr x5, [x9, #40]
>> + ldr x4, [x9, #32]
>> + ldr x3, [x9, #24]
>> + ldr x2, [x9, #16]
>> + ldr x1, [x9, #8]
>> + ldr x0, [x9]
>
> Why not keep using ldp, but with x9?
>
This is a computed jump, depending on the size of the stack frame,
hence the inverted order, and the LDRs. While probably harmless in
most cases, it is arguably incorrect to copy random data from memory
into these registers (and could even be a security issue)
>>
>> - blr x19
>> +0: br x8
>>
>> - mov sp, x20
>> - ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
>> - ldp x19, x20, [sp], #16
>> + //
>> + // More than 64 bytes: we need to build the full native stack frame and copy
>> + // the part of the VM stack exceeding 64 bytes (which may contain stacked
>> + // arguments) to the native stack
>> + //
>> +1: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
>> + mov x29, sp
>>
>> - ret
>> + //
>> + // Ensure that the stack pointer remains 16 byte aligned,
>> + // even if the size of the VM stack frame is not a multiple of 16
>> + //
>> + add x1, x1, #64 // Skip over [potential] reg params
>> + tbz x3, #3, 2f // Multiple of 16?
>> + ldr x4, [x2, #-8]! // No? Then push one word
>> + str x4, [sp, #-16]! // ... but use two slots
>> + b 3f
>> +
>> +2: ldp x4, x5, [x2, #-16]!
>> + stp x4, x5, [sp, #-16]!
>> +3: cmp x2, x1
>> + b.gt 2b
>> +
>> + ldp x0, x1, [x9]
>> + ldp x2, x3, [x9, #16]
>> + ldp x4, x5, [x9, #32]
>> + ldp x6, x7, [x9, #48]
>> +
>> + blr x8
>> +
>> + mov sp, x29
>> + ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
>> + ret
>>
>> //****************************************************************************
>> // EbcLLEbcInterpret
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-26 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 14:59 [PATCH v3 0/4] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe: AARCH64 improvements Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-17 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe AARCH64: clean up comment style in ASM file Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-26 11:06 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-08-17 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe AARCH64: use a fixed size thunk structure Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-26 12:28 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-08-17 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] MdeModulePkg/EbxDxe AARCH64: use tail call for EBC to native thunk Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-26 12:54 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-08-26 17:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-08-26 18:10 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-08-26 18:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-17 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] MdeModulePkg/EbcDxe AARCH64: simplify interpreter entry point thunks Ard Biesheuvel
2016-08-26 12:56 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu_rgPcwh66_Le-4fhhx7FFtEr6YHtYfzYP1999yGYQSJw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox