public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "ming.huang@linaro.org" <ming.huang@linaro.org>,
	"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	 "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH resend] MdeModulePkg/EsrtDxe: allocate ESRT table from RtServicesData memory
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:42:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_uhyHHDe7bcH=UMcxYLPkvVTBbgM2=f0iK7N6K7uoYZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9C9B56C@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 19:36, Michael D Kinney
<michael.d.kinney@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> The UEFI Specification Section 23.3 says:
>
>         "The ESRT shall be stored in memory of type EfiBootServicesData."
>
> If an RT driver needs ESRT info after ExitBootServices(), then the
> RT driver should collect that information before ExitBootServices().
>

But that means that before EBS(), we will have to make a copy of the
ESRT into runtime services data, and we will end up using twice as
much memory - one copy in boot services data for the OS, and one copy
in runtime services data for the firmware itself. I understand the
reasoning behind preferring boot over runtime, so that the OS is not
burdened with it if it does not care. But it this case, the RT
services data will be allocated regardless, and so we end up using
less memory if we expose that same copy to the OS.




>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ard
> > Biesheuvel
> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 7:13 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: ming.huang@linaro.org; Wu, Hao A
> > <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J
> > <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> > <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH resend]
> > MdeModulePkg/EsrtDxe: allocate ESRT table from
> > RtServicesData memory
> >
> > Given that the firmware itself may access the ESRT
> > table when the OS
> > invokes the UpdateCapsule () boot service, it requires
> > a virtual mapping
> > and so it needs to be allocated from RtServicesData
> > memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
> > <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/EsrtDxe/EsrtDxe.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EsrtDxe/EsrtDxe.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EsrtDxe/EsrtDxe.c
> > index a386a9770583..1741cbe8f2b5 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EsrtDxe/EsrtDxe.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/EsrtDxe/EsrtDxe.c
> > @@ -571,7 +571,8 @@ EsrtReadyToBootEventNotify (
> >      goto EXIT;
> >    }
> >
> > -  EsrtTable =
> > AllocatePool(sizeof(EFI_SYSTEM_RESOURCE_TABLE) +
> > NonFmpRepositorySize + FmpRepositorySize);
> > +  EsrtTable = AllocateRuntimePool
> > (sizeof(EFI_SYSTEM_RESOURCE_TABLE) +
> > +
> > NonFmpRepositorySize + FmpRepositorySize);
> >    if (EsrtTable == NULL) {
> >      DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "Esrt table memory allocation
> > failure\n"));
> >      goto EXIT;
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> 
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-19 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19 14:13 [PATCH resend] MdeModulePkg/EsrtDxe: allocate ESRT table from RtServicesData memory Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-19 17:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2019-04-19 17:42   ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-04-19 17:53     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-19 18:08       ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-19 18:11         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-19 18:23           ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-19 18:38             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-19 18:43               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-19 19:46                 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-19 20:04                   ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-20 10:25                     ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu_uhyHHDe7bcH=UMcxYLPkvVTBbgM2=f0iK7N6K7uoYZA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox