From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243; helo=mail-oi0-x243.google.com; envelope-from=saxenap.ltc@gmail.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com (mail-oi0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6946C21125469 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id k190-v6so4080869oib.9 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bUhWnN0/Lf1/CjaNyuRV4aOh2UWiFQumNeaWHii/giQ=; b=nAyfCZf1+lMofUPIEyaKA903WngGio288caZINdCMjNw7NV94MeLuIyO1W2AzUtSga GkQ86lVTOBuxcTKHqAvYArqNBY9o1RTqakIxYIhS5ueVmr3gDSeombKG2GhsAoMddx2Q dHYhWwAZpwJAyHbFKwrQEako9wAv5xST1PlTDhEWlyuG2PZCSsIOlF7lGejDNDOJOjtw 86gAQJOCp+zHAjO+u/7A02OE28r/mCbmrktusrdrD+xukfDLLthp2KFrTcet1YGTzTr2 N8b1jVMlTtzqGCciai+TJqdc+X8gfBgEUiImBT6czLhIZdmKxWMcrlkfnaS+u7t8aa1o 8MDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bUhWnN0/Lf1/CjaNyuRV4aOh2UWiFQumNeaWHii/giQ=; b=nQaL1gbfZqEc0TCnTApYQDZfusXtlWzT0jqPPuFDvHtJXXqQZu0VaKc7CJNBeEocFU DSy/jAbQVwzZXHymWpJBa3+mrbsNChxoTjuU6Rtr7IEmng+v1D1REjf03isyb1dmguAl UACItTEfQB1Pfw6Fdwi5NVh2TytvadNJ+kH1jbAR66EYpCH9JlaSbd9ad4NqbbCjfqDE Y/2rrE8lI54p37jjm1aZCTL6A7hAUHJ81iD+wj18cL0DXWOWFYNlT7ORQXWCVHCLRZYJ gfJCk5ITJQL0AyQUkSIWwZ1kn9TptDrCYRwvrLg6WCmR7QSxZ//0GN8GzI7tDDfx5oK5 LTtw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E28LlRYLARZyf8GD4YXpKvy4bYVbYbWHKJZriAFmaiy6Abw1r/P ne+s47kgfuX0/1mASl5/BoNYcqe50if130lZswu9hw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJGmopsgRVldq4Z/1H8a1P+O2aOeL/3HLiBoI1rlHyPBK4QT/t+R0ycrFAZBMEDBqLQKuTujMA5d4rsq5Huxd4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:fdcb:: with SMTP id b194-v6mr691765oii.24.1528254311063; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:05:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:1a22:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:05:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Prerna Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 08:35:10 +0530 Message-ID: To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: Laszlo Ersek X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 06:33:36 -0700 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 Subject: 4MB flash size as build default. X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 03:05:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Laszlo, I noticed that the following commit was used to make the 4MB flash layout the default for edk2 builds briefly: bba8dfbec3bb OvmfPkg: make the 4MB flash size the default However, it was later reverted : 6e49d01cfb43 Revert "OvmfPkg: make the 4MB flash size the default" presumably to fix this issue: 0c79471d6a98 OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: handle non-power-of-two spare size for emu variables Given that the above commit was also merged, why does edk2 still default to the 2MB flash layout for builds? Do you see any other issues too with the 4MB flash layout ? Regards, Prerna