From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com [185.125.188.123]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.36516.1670292454417382059 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:07:35 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=o31MmTYe; spf=pass (domain: canonical.com, ip: 185.125.188.123, mailfrom: dann.frazier@canonical.com) Received: from mail-io1-f70.google.com (mail-io1-f70.google.com [209.85.166.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91614188C for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 02:07:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1670292450; bh=RlMmCGfB3d7fmX1C2tA3MiLo4JnnIBjCaTd1wwfqp90=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=o31MmTYeVWNkh0RZ4w1+e/v+/VDNs8fi6Saxmk75jPognr+IRHk7rPU/j+yb/TV9D Z5SCl5noWpz7LIx9uYlhyqdKYXwmFCMY8J9CSIpmN/x0IWAEXO40/ZvJHaPRL5/diM 5g5hrlsP5i5ewwUmNbHC1Xec6u/YmnMnE5eKPXPolQkxtptsbpYXPKgpF9Cvqmtpey XZUPqbCNXLwKtMzBl45rdZBfZTygCXUd735WuNUpCSpp0cK9BOZt6UPyQFMXtD8lx2 cMmxjpRfZOVAWdBagm4PLTV2xsmYXNk55qjkGr6LDNMrZx3G3zNxXDogrJAohE+VT6 kJN6U0Ze6gMUA== Received: by mail-io1-f70.google.com with SMTP id c23-20020a6b4e17000000b006db1063fc9aso10944344iob.14 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:07:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RlMmCGfB3d7fmX1C2tA3MiLo4JnnIBjCaTd1wwfqp90=; b=UhIPx9wmetdTNINA1FllDV6mzA+B+FbOICvh0as0EzEgSndAZoGRSRb0D63ZwlvjzZ SUM4cXa5B55lqvv0dw13GX79TRh++HPzYyJRuBcHipKsD6Lw8KB7DHNEg0RQDS4XVFqO 5duIi63S3Y6mkYn7S0OK2LYgCIYR7bB3TfxLiD593Ti8OqLMaHwWJO4EchBF6qfAO3UT aCIVo1kTW9bpg2bbMGthgtIwNg0uLNX0drGVJq2ldq0FB6dwkfPfzmHTmUvVPvDS79dq /An2+mthVy4xTzGnoYVL3rRHDpbqGy1IyGjdZxwkBFnVYimjB6P4t/dmwG9ue9c/3INd VXrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk8BhnPjLcS4ywBbGJWXtc3Uo57qbJyMlipo5ws+CDoEomtW0di WmgLZ2agkKRIa3bNcmI05LCgZzzsEG7dcjLq9BdUBeVRNVBJtnp1lRRziLSZ+XFe8FPX5d7dvZ1 1SdgsqpVoQz8OYjjXursU/3n1i3TvQBjq0jXuRcZCPiy8MPE= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c644:0:b0:6db:32cd:9cda with SMTP id s4-20020a5ec644000000b006db32cd9cdamr33648117ioo.34.1670292449162; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:07:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4fSbnv+jM1PAX4M7yJzoPMFjDucje+d41NGMY2XYLFAMx0cjDiWo0R/FEsIdSZ7eIizB3Y7xqo9RMDuK0FJFc= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c644:0:b0:6db:32cd:9cda with SMTP id s4-20020a5ec644000000b006db32cd9cdamr33648108ioo.34.1670292448935; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:07:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220726194640.1920-1-michael.d.kinney@intel.com> <20220726194640.1920-2-michael.d.kinney@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: "dann frazier" Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:07:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch 1/2] OvmfPkg: Change default to disable MptScsi and PvScsi To: "Kinney, Michael D" Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" , Ard Biesheuvel , "Yao, Jiewen" , "Justen, Jordan L" , Gerd Hoffmann , "Boeuf, Sebastien" , Brijesh Singh , "Aktas, Erdem" , James Bottomley , "Xu, Min M" , Tom Lendacky Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 6:25 PM Kinney, Michael D wrote: > > Hi Dann, > > The purpose of this first step was due to lack of support/maintainers/reviewers. > > If there are issues, then we need to find maintainers/reviewers starting with > those that are using and depend on these features. > > If there are no issues from disabling these by default, then the 2nd step > would be deleting the code and the flags. > > Are these features actually being used? Apparently - assuming I've correctly connected the dots: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016359