From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Jake Garver <jake@nvidia.com>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"rebecca@bsdio.com" <rebecca@bsdio.com>,
"gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"bob.c.feng@intel.com" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
"yuwei.chen@intel.com" <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools/GenFw: Change opcode when converting ADR to ADRP
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:31:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXE_kcB532oy-Ss_zN21aOM2nBR=DWv74v3eHpLBXvJofg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR12MB78883870D9DD49AB6022C49CAD8DA@PH0PR12MB7888.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 15:58, Jake Garver <jake@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Totally understand and agree, Ard.
>
> In the meantime, I've now experienced the issue with Ubuntu22's GCC 12.3. Originally, we didn't see the issue on this toolchain, but a developer ran into when preparing a change. Even more concerning, when I instrumented that change, it went away. So, it seems to be very sensitive to the input, which will make it hard to reproduce.
>
> Specifically, like the Ubuntu20 10.5 toolchain, the Ubuntu 12.3 toolchain generated an R_AARCH64_ADR_GOT_PAGE relocation against an ADR instruction. Further, it was when loading the value of __stack_chk_guard.
>
> I was again unable to reproduce this using a crosstool-ng build of GCC 12.3, even when matching the ./configure arguments.
>
> Since it's now reproducible in a toolchain we're actively using, I'll continue looking at it. I'll let you know what I find.
OK, mystery solved.
# Load to set the stack canary
2ffc: 10000480 adr x0, 0x308c
3008: 912ec000 add x0, x0, #0xbb0
The location of the ADRP instruction is at the end of a 4k page
(0xffc), which could trigger erratum #843419 on Cortex-A53, and is
therefore converted into ADR.
This unfortunately implies that converting it back into ADRP is
problematic, unless the code is guaranteed to never run on affected
Cortex-A53 CPUs.
Instead, we'll need to do something like (untested)
--- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
+++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
@@ -1562,7 +1562,11 @@ WriteSections64 (
// subsequent LDR instruction (covered by a
R_AARCH64_LD64_GOT_LO12_NC
// relocation) into an ADD instruction - this is handled above.
//
- Offset = (Sym->st_value - (Rel->r_offset & ~0xfff)) >> 12;
+ if ((*(UINT32 *)Targ & BIT31) == 0) {
+ Offset = (Sym->st_value & ~0xfff) - Rel->r_offset;
+ } else {
+ Offset = (Sym->st_value - (Rel->r_offset & ~0xfff)) >> 12;
+ }
*(UINT32 *)Targ &= 0x9000001f;
*(UINT32 *)Targ |= ((Offset & 0x1ffffc) << (5 - 2)) |
((Offset & 0x3) << 29);
so that we keep the ADR but use the correct offset to refer to the 4k
page holding the symbol. We'll need to range check offset here,
though, as the GOT may just be within reach but the symbol itself may
not.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#112488): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/112488
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102202314/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 15:31 [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools/GenFw: Change opcode when converting ADR to ADRP Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-10-26 18:46 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-10-27 12:44 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-10-27 13:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-10-27 14:09 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-10-27 14:12 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-10-27 14:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-10-27 14:26 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-10-27 14:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-10-27 15:52 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-11-02 11:47 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-11-02 12:47 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-12-06 16:51 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-12-12 9:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-13 14:57 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-12-13 17:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2023-12-13 18:01 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-12-13 19:47 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-12-19 23:29 ` Jake Garver via groups.io
2023-12-20 7:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-10-27 14:10 ` Pedro Falcato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMj1kXE_kcB532oy-Ss_zN21aOM2nBR=DWv74v3eHpLBXvJofg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox