From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.14304.1673014508740514835
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Fri, 06 Jan 2023 06:15:08 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Z+V/g8/k;
 spf=pass (domain: kernel.org, ip: 139.178.84.217, mailfrom: ardb@kernel.org)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6374261698
	for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Fri,  6 Jan 2023 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5F3FC433EF
	for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Fri,  6 Jan 2023 14:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1673014506;
	bh=EMwzsJ2RjGszijcVrl80yobh/obGdHYScRkka8Cawp0=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From;
	b=Z+V/g8/k62pljvjfenyPaIwEBiJjfqhwpD3Jq/XN+JfMcchHGfI8r7HRlKK28G9d3
	 HmAOuPyWM79hEBQzekj8FdSpjDV6QestAYSrqc/uTtJk8I4JW7CeO0gGJW/ur7/Di9
	 tRmsW41OzM9lnw6mtT8jEqr1/mXoZXtl3f+wakc2+9NVevC7yMO3xLVCj4MGXkgLii
	 qsNBa5cgnqd5RWOTNfBZriJ+2wL0HlJ4wGuCafn78s3XIMwwgjhQ5pU9yI7GUB/2kx
	 VZdeG9cdV2gytkWQHH30+uBOJ1CpG6xibJTbzoRZQADKELfRUPhs36G9H3eslPzfEw
	 uj5a7dZfq6HSQ==
Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id bn6so1543568ljb.13
        for <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 06:15:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krLTZN4YRIAVErY3hU84Ly4sxrJ0CGhgpHHHG0hGK9P3ZJMF79t
	G1rSuyUeyPaBMI1bv/8d0T5eme7l1y188Z/X3LQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt95a6FzzJHnHR5GQ07afgaiCUk3GPYb8ihtv4VwJmJevS9l5elrS5h+gT5yIPvx2whj7VkqVISZgQuuGqGxLg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bd0c:0:b0:27f:bc58:3924 with SMTP id
 n12-20020a2ebd0c000000b0027fbc583924mr3251057ljq.352.1673014504826; Fri, 06
 Jan 2023 06:15:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230106140403.2889131-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230106140403.2889131-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:14:53 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFukYZHr61Mpz1g4taZUJY+J=MG-1pdeGv54Lg-pUqWAw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFukYZHr61Mpz1g4taZUJY+J=MG-1pdeGv54Lg-pUqWAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] OvmfPkg: check 64bit mmio window for resource conflicts
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>, 
	=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7Mgw4lyc2Vr?= <lersek@redhat.com>, 
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>, Pawel Polawski <ppolawsk@redhat.com>, 
	Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Gerd,

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 15:04, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Gerd Hoffmann (2):
>   OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: update PlatformScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram
>     documentation
>   OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: check 64bit mmio window for resource
>     conflicts
>
>  OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/MemDetect.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>

Mind adding a teeny bit of context to explain why this is needed? No
need to respin or anything - just want to make sure i understand the
problem and the solution.