From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, pedro.falcato@gmail.com,
Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix UNUSED_VALUE Coverity issue
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:31:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGvcmaer+ke7Ot8TMbYNmD5Y6NjdL0ENJUOidnrE_PTrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9DWXBums3-tF+JYxU2BtsJs2-1+bu+SFJeZ5WHQ5hh7XQ6NQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 10:10, Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> I counted myself as not the right person to decide what all to do if Status is not successful. Adding the DEBUG statement from the Coverity aspect doesn't count as a fix as RELEASE mode behavior remains the same.
>
> In the comments / description, I already mentioned - Assuming, this non-usage is deliberate, so as such I did not intend to hide anything - and left it in the status quo.
>
> The patch proposed may not be appropriate, but should now give a thinking point to active module developers / owners / maintainers if they indeed feel that there is a bug here and it needs to be fixed.
>
Thanks - I agree that it is a good thing that people are aware of this now.
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 4:33 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 18:04, Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 8:42 PM Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
>> > >
>> > > The return value stored in Status after call to SetDriveParameters
>> > > is not made of any use thereafter and hence it remains as UNUSED.
>> > > Assuming, this non-usage is deliberate, the storage in Status can be
>> > > done away with.
>> > >
>> > > Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
>> > > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
>> > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4204
>> > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c | 2 +-
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c
>> > > index 75403886e44a..c6d637afa989 100644
>> > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c
>> > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/IdeMode.c
>> > > @@ -2555,7 +2555,7 @@ DetectAndConfigIdeDevice (
>> > > DriveParameters.Heads = (UINT8)(((ATA5_IDENTIFY_DATA *)(&Buffer.AtaData))->heads - 1);
>> > > DriveParameters.MultipleSector = (UINT8)((ATA5_IDENTIFY_DATA *)(&Buffer.AtaData))->multi_sector_cmd_max_sct_cnt;
>> > >
>> > > - Status = SetDriveParameters (Instance, IdeChannel, IdeDevice, &DriveParameters, NULL);
>> > > + SetDriveParameters (Instance, IdeChannel, IdeDevice, &DriveParameters, NULL);
>> >
>> > I'm /fairly/ sure this is wrong and that you need to use Status.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, removing the assignment fixes the coverity warning, but now you
>> are hiding a bug instead of fixing it.
>>
>> SetDriveParameters () can apparently fail, and this is being ignored.
>> At the very least, we should emit a diagnostic here in DEBUG mode to
>> log this. E.g.,
>>
>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "%a: SetDriveParameters () failed - %r\n",
>> __func__, Status));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 7:09 [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix SIGN_EXTENSION Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-06-02 7:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix UNUSED_VALUE " Ranbir Singh
2023-06-03 16:04 ` [edk2-devel] " Pedro Falcato
2023-06-04 23:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-05 8:10 ` Ranbir Singh
2023-06-05 8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2023-06-08 6:55 ` Wu, Hao A
2023-06-08 10:17 ` Ranbir Singh
2023-06-09 1:22 ` Wu, Hao A
2023-06-04 22:58 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru: Fix SIGN_EXTENSION " Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-05 7:53 ` Ranbir Singh
2023-06-05 8:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-05 9:15 ` Ranbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMj1kXGvcmaer+ke7Ot8TMbYNmD5Y6NjdL0ENJUOidnrE_PTrA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox