From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
To: "Marvin Häuser" <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeIpl: Relocate and remap XIP capable DXE drivers
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:38:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXH-yeZjj6kZm9wz3tzOfE+uz25OvkRy7Vd3py9jai9EcA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3425.1685437617401609070@groups.io>
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 11:07, Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> Native PE toolchains *generally* also generate XIP images (/ALIGN = /FILEALIGN, but with 32 Byte rather than 64 Byte alignment compared to GCC49+ / CLANGDWARF) [1]. However, because they are underaligned by default (even for RT images that run in an OS context and MM drivers... sigh...), platforms manually override SectionAlignment, but not necessarily FileAlignment [2], breaking XIP. I don't think what you are doing is perfectly safe for these, as they will have FileAlignment < SectionAlignment (and by all chances, BaseTools is borked too). In my opinion check for FileAlignment == SectionAlignment. I can't vouch for how likely FileAlignment has a sane value, the AUDK loader does not read it at all and instead checks PointerToRawData == VirtualAddress, etc.
>
> BaseTools generally has poor support for non-XIP vs XIP, probably due to notorious underalignment since the very beginning. For PEIM XIPs for example, which must ship pre-relocated at least for Intel, GenFv just relocates the image in-memory and then copies the changes back to the FFS file [3]. There is no concept of changing the image file size within the procedure and as such, a non-XIP image cannot be converted to XIP on demand. This would be useful for a distinction between pre-memory and post-memory PEIMs, the former of which must be XIP (thus aligned), while the latter can be loaded and relocated in-RAM (thus can be underaligned w.r.t. FileAlignment), but alas.
>
If XIP for PE images with 4k section alignment is an issue, we could
always explore loading them into a separate allocation from PEI, just
like we do with DXE core itself.
This would actually simplify the loader code quite a lot, as we'd be
able to use the PEI core image loader directly. However, it means we'd
have to pass this information (array of <guid, base address> tuples
describing which images were already loaded by DxeIpl) via a HOB or
some other method.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 10:16 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Permit DXE drivers to execute in place Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:16 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Remove unused 'EntryPoint' argument to LoadImage Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 5:54 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 7:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:16 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Remove unused DstBuffer arg from LoadImage Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 5:58 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-29 10:16 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Remove FreePage argument from CoreUnloadImage Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 5:59 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-29 10:16 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Avoid caching memory mapped FFS files Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:03 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 7:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:16 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Use memory mapped FV protocol to avoid image copy Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:21 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 7:51 ` [edk2-devel] " Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 8:40 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 8:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Expose memory mapped FV protocol when possible Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:22 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Execute loaded images in place if possible Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:32 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 7:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeIpl: Relocate and remap XIP capable DXE drivers Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:45 ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 7:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 8:02 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 8:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 9:06 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-30 9:18 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-30 9:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2023-05-30 9:41 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-30 9:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 9:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 9:52 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-30 10:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 10:25 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-31 7:13 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-31 8:05 ` Marvin Häuser
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Add PCD NX policy bit for default NX state Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 6:54 ` Ni, Ray
2023-05-30 8:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtQemu: Allow CPU arch protocol DXE to execute in place Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 10:17 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtQemu: Map all DRAM non-execute by default Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-01 14:53 ` [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Permit DXE drivers to execute in place Oliver Smith-Denny
2023-06-01 18:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-01 18:30 ` Oliver Smith-Denny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMj1kXH-yeZjj6kZm9wz3tzOfE+uz25OvkRy7Vd3py9jai9EcA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox