From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com (mail-ua0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB8D8039F for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u30so148658843uau.0 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:29:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7D3Jbk37AbzTR9CwQ88yZoyp9L4cQS3ap/JXdcR/Kpw=; b=aiNUQcBoHSjFf5oVz5zD97vZir1Ubxd69t5rAj1UfPFYqq95Dy41scDo554IRwN+Iq xRJUN1XNe8PKwizw3ZPO9NFNNI6kImowh8y+A8VdjmN9NGpd5tmcrxt9lj9CwvLG/msB SqVvHceR8AEgzArMY2MT1Qkqr3EF4yp+oqBQWF+A9aF6uFl6ty3l74Tx4emSKsU5Z5kg nlTD1lw8mW/En+awR2bm1OV0Tc1+ggghOMRb+TyxtqXmmhsdegnIhNWXtaEPSkOVV5ua 1QjbR5FjK4tVG4sXmqANnrORxOhrhY4UwAG8g3kADgdnR6+JcaKAXWbXpktdaXb+TZQV R/Yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7D3Jbk37AbzTR9CwQ88yZoyp9L4cQS3ap/JXdcR/Kpw=; b=TlqHdGWdK1WlBDqomReDzUCylUp+76ZneoSyotCW5ixSljz2fSzoBOwj9c2qtFE4yF 64J7H8onwUlbhRLJe0pkAY/LAiWBOABNHhwz9QjZiPM2jBLreLscfRpwnYl/90ORdzVn p4gzRAnBnYKICp9x2l+09YYh39xEyHk/9i3b4Axy51mLrhcaZgQrGOfRfjzYMzQWMgJ6 ra3NgCXB4iGyro/zSQhDnj/eq/W+xXWAco4X6HZXHdNZQNQSfrRaRbSzoawyR3INp4F8 tmxZAVOg/QvgOnf+gfRG1a//5FhNVflJv/dJ0sgm10oRIqgmnSngBoQ51p6TCgCUe9LS SsXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39leU2rwxfRAOSYba2bD5kDFuZ6pnRmQilF3mN2VbysZWtkDmG7fJkSxt5+zKX2gfZHLO/95iVulIjy47g== X-Received: by 10.159.37.243 with SMTP id 106mr15180018uaf.9.1489386548144; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:29:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.151.68 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:29:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D6EECA4@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D6EECA4@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Michael Zimmermann Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:29:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Gao, Liming" Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Zhu, Yonghong" Subject: Re: overriding variables from cmdline used in fdf broken? X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 06:29:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I just tested it again and apparently everything is working just fine now. So either, I've done something wrong in past or you guys have already fixed it. Sorry for not testing before bumping this old thread. Thanks Michael On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Gao, Liming wrote: > Michael: > I agree this is a bug. Could you enter it into bugzillar? > > Thanks > Liming >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Zimmermann [mailto:sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 12:44 AM >> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org >> Cc: Zhu, Yonghong ; Gao, Liming >> Subject: Re: [edk2] overriding variables from cmdline used in fdf broken? >> >> I forgot to CC the maintainers back then so I'm doing this now. >> >> Thanks >> Michael >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Michael Zimmermann >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > when I override or set a variable using -DNAME=VAL from the build cmdline >> > these are visible to the DSC file only, the FDF continues using the >> > old/undefined values - at least if you use them as a value, i.e.: >> > BaseAddress = $(FD_BASE)|gArmTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFdBaseAddress >> > >> > is this intended behavior or a bug? >> > >> > Michael